Laserfiche WebLink
5.01: Consider Boulevard Trees for the Barren Side of Sunwood Drive in The COR <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood reviewed the staff report and <br />recommendation to proceed with the Base Bid planting only at this time in the amount of $45,639. <br />The Add Alternate could be considered with some sort of cost -sharing agreement with the <br />adjoining landowner, or at a future time. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for a discrepancy between the numbers in the presentation versus <br />the numbers in the report. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood replied that the difference was the cost for <br />grass seed that he had forgotten to include. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she spoke with the private business owner a while back and <br />he had stated that he would not be interested as the trees could be damaged during construction <br />when the site is developed. She asked if the area proposed for the trees would be protected during <br />future construction practices. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood provided details on the proposed planting <br />location. He noted that the City followed a similar plan on the other side of the street and those <br />trees were not damaged during construction of those sites. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if this action would increase the value of the land sale and <br />whether dollars would be reallocated to the forestry fund at that time. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood stated that the City could administer a land <br />sale proceed to come back to that fund but did not believe that would be necessary. He stated that <br />he cannot demonstrate that someone would pay more for a lot with trees on it, but the land would <br />look nicer and have better curb appeal. He stated that it would also reduce the cost for the <br />developer to plant those trees and install irrigation in that area. He commented that there would <br />be benefit to all properties that purchase land and will also provide a community benefit in traffic <br />calming and the general aesthetic. He noted that planting these trees now would also avoid <br />significant size differences between the trees on each side of the road. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that this seems to be a good use of the forestry fund and did also <br />support the concept of having trees of similar sizes on both sides of the road. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she previously did not support this but was happy to <br />see the lower bids and identified funding source. She stated that this will also improve the aesthetic <br />which provides benefit to the local businesses. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood stated that he did send the case to Mr. Kuker <br />and has had communication with him but noted that his lack of response most likely signals that <br />he does not want to participate in this project. <br />Public Works Committee / April 18, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />