My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/26/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 05/26/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:38:37 PM
Creation date
3/31/2006 6:04:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/26/1981
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
totally paid through special assessments collected from the <br />benefitted property. The bond payment schedule is contained <br />in Figure 6. <br /> <br />Ramsey is now on the verge of being served by metropolitan <br />sewer service. At the same time that it is constructing <br />the local sewer system, the city will also construct a water <br />supply system. In keeping with previous policy, bond <br />payments for these improvements will be paid entirely from <br />special assessments. <br /> <br />Borrowing Capacity <br /> <br />To date, the city does not have any bonded debt that is <br />subject to the debt limit, since all of the revenue needed <br />to make the bond payments is derived from special <br />assessments. Therefore, the city has unused borrowing <br />capacity equal to its debt limit of 6 2/3% of its assessed <br />valuation. Projections of the city's assessed valuation, <br />debt limit and borrowing capacity are contained in Figure <br />7. If the city adopts a bond issue in the future for a non- <br />revenue producing purpose, such as park acquisition and <br />development, such a bond would be subject to the debt <br />limitJ Property taxes raised to make such bond payments <br />would be exempt from levy limit under current laws, however. <br /> <br /> Mill Rate Pro~ection~ <br /> Figure 7 also shows a projection of the mill rate under the high, <br /> medium an Iow population projections. These are presented for <br /> discussion only, since there are many assumptions and potential <br /> variables that would affect them. Generally, the mill rate is <br /> projected to increase 1 or 2% per year even with the 8% levy <br /> limit, because local aid was held constant at $149,000 per ypar. <br /> The projected tax levy was derived by taking the levy limit base <br /> projections from Figure and subtracting $149,000 from each <br /> figure. This projection is for limited levies only, so if the <br /> city has significant amounts of exempt or special levies in the <br /> future (e.g. for bond payments, welfare purposes, mandatory <br /> programs), the mill rate will be greater. _ <br /> <br />Another'variable that the assessed value projections do not take <br />into consideration is the industrial growth that the city is <br />proposing in its comprehensive plan. The expenditure projections <br />do not take into consideration the additional cost of city <br />services to serve this accelerated industrial growth either. <br />Current law allows special levies and levy limit adjustments to <br />compensate somewhat for the increased costs. The city should <br />'carefully consider whether the increase in assessed value will <br />offset the increase in the cost of services or whether there will <br />be an effect on the mill rate. The city should also remember <br />that under fiscal disparities law, forty percent(40%) of the <br />increase in 'commercial/industrial assessed value will have tc be <br />shared wiith the rest-of the region. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.