Agenda - Council - 05/26/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I. INTRODUCTION The CAB Area Cities have pursued a· cooperative program of studies, review, public hearings and subsequent alternative studies for an extended period of time to ·achieve an approved- sanitary sewer and disposal system. This program has included the cooperative efforts of the Cities of; Anoka, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Ramsey and Andover, all referred to as the CAB 1 (Chgmplin, Anoka, Brooklyn Park) Sanitary Sewer Interceptor service community of the northwest metropolitan area. This Pr09ram has involved the jurisdictional controlling input of the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC), Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the over-· riding rules and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The communities are generally located within the lo~al Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) district, as designated by the Metropolitan Council. The Metro' Council, as the overall controlling planning agency, has determined that all public utilities and transportation facilities under their jurisdiction will be provided to all the cities within that MUSA district.' Growth control of this metro area is the need and a cost effec- tive program for providing services based on sound environmental standards is the benefit. All of the area people have the need for a water quality management control program that will provide- a benefit to them. The CAB cities have been advocates of controlling growth by utilizing a program of requiring all land development to be served by municipal utilities and an-approved street and highway system·. Set aside areas for long range (20 Yr.) development have been programmed according to projected population growths and the resulting land us~ requirements. City utilities and the services necessary to support suburban growth have been -1-