Laserfiche WebLink
Area Considerations <br /> .(continued) <br /> <br /> of it as the jurisdictional agencies decide. Meet- <br /> ing the development needs appear to be basic reasons <br /> for eliminating the'problems we presently have. Ap- <br /> proval.of programs to meet the development needs will· <br /> eliminate the requirement of a replay of this 40 act <br /> drama in the future. <br /> <br /> Regional policies, as defined in the 208 Plan and the <br /> development framework covers both general water quality <br /> policy and specific project reco~mendatlons, as well as <br /> development policies. <br /> <br /> Policy 28 of the 208 Plan prioritizes projects as <br /> follows: <br /> <br /> Priority 1. Achievement and maintenance of water <br /> quality standards and maintenance and replacement <br /> of existing systems. <br /> <br /> Priority 2. Extension of the system where growth <br /> projected in the metropolitan development frame- <br /> work for the 1990 MUSA is limited by a shortage <br /> in metropolitan sewer services. <br /> <br /> Priority 3. Extension of the system to a develop- <br /> ment framework sector/policy subarea, where other · <br /> public services are already planned or are in <br /> place. <br /> <br /> Priorty 4. Initial provisions of a metropolitan --~ <br /> service to a development framework sector/policy <br /> subarea. <br /> <br />The priorities listed above clearly dictate that a sani- <br />tary sewer collection system be approved for the CAB area <br />communitieS. Multimillion, extensive, Metropolitan <br />Council approved transportation facilities are under con- <br />struction to serve this northwestern metro area. The <br />Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been completed <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br /> <br />