Laserfiche WebLink
proposing to add an additional sixty-nine (69) stalls, all of which appear to meet the dimensional standards (18' <br />deep x 9' wide). The combination of existing and proposed parking stalls satisfies the minimum standards of City <br />Code. <br />Utilities <br />The building is currently served by a private well and septic system. As part of the expansion project, the septic <br />system will be abandoned and the building will be connected to the municipal sanitary sewer system. The <br />Applicant is proposing to retain the private well on site for irrigation purposes only. The building will be <br />connected to the municipal water system. A fire hydrant will also be installed as part of the site improvements. <br />The Fire Department is requesting the hydrant be moved from the proposed location (southwest corner of the <br />southern parking lot) out to Limonite Street, just south of the southern access point, which is right where the <br />water line enters the Subject Property. <br />Stormwater Management <br />As part of the site improvements, multiple stormwater basins will be constructed. These basins will only handle <br />stormwater from the Subject Property and will not include stormwater from public rights -of -way or other <br />properties. Thus, the Applicant will be responsible for long-term maintenance of these basins. A Stormwater <br />Treatment and Ponding Maintenance Agreement will need to be executed and recorded. The agreement is <br />attached to this case. <br />Landscaping and Tree Preservation <br />The project will result in removal of essentially all existing trees, with the exception of three (3) trees along 143rd <br />Avenue. While the proposed landscaping appears to comply with the planting requirements, because of the extent <br />of tree removal, additional reforestation and/or restitution (payment into the Community Forestry fund) is <br />required. Aside from that, the landscaping plan is generally acceptable. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the Site Plan at their April 27, 2023, meeting and unanimously <br />recommended approval (note that one Planning Commissioner recused himself from the discussion due to a <br />conflict of interest). There were no public comments received on the request (either written or verbal). <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative 1: Approve the Site Plan. The proposed building expansion meets all setbacks and performance <br />standards, with just minor plan corrections still needed. Staff supports this alternative. <br />Alternative 2: Approve the Site Plan with modifications. <br />Alternative 3: Deny the Site Plan. The City Council would need to identify specific findings that would support <br />this action. Staff does not support this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />The Applicant is responsible for all costs associated with this request. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Planning Commission recommended approving the Site Plan. <br />Action: <br />Motion to Resolution #23-076 approving the Site Plan and Stormwater Maintenance Agreement. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Site Plan <br />