Laserfiche WebLink
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers <br /> <br />FROM: City Administrator <br /> <br />RE: Council Business <br /> <br />(D2-a) <br /> <br />(D2-b) <br /> <br />(D2-c) <br /> <br />(D2-d) <br /> <br />City Attorney's memo and excerpt of Personnel Committee meeting <br />minutes regarding billing of developers and applicants <br />Staff memo and Metro Council's memo regarding rural residential <br />densities <br />Information regarding preliminary plat approval of Kovar <br />Addition <br />City Engineer's report of sealcoating inspection <br /> <br />~SE #1: <br /> <br />CASE 92: <br /> <br />MAYO~/C~3MCIL <br /> <br />At your last meeting, Councilmember COx requested that Mayor/Council <br />input be the first ite~ of business at the next meeting. Inasmuch as <br />you concurred, this item has been placed first on your agenda. <br /> <br />I_temA: ADDroval of City AttorR~¥'~ ~q~est to Bill Reqular <br /> Mourlv Rates to APPlicants and Develoserm: <br /> <br />Enclosure (D2-a) contains the City Attorney's memo dated March 5, <br />1985 regarding the billing of applicants and developers. This went <br />before t_he Council Personnel Committee on March 6, 1985 and they have <br />recor~aended apprgval of the City Attorney's request. Please refer to <br />the above enclosure for an excerpt of Personnel Committee meeting <br />minutes. <br /> <br />Your action will be to approve/disapprove of the City Attorney's <br />request. ~he following propesed motion is hereby submitted for your <br />consideration: <br /> <br />Motion by and seconded by. to approve <br />of the City Attorney billing applicants and developers at his <br />regular office billing fee of $85.00 per hour based on the <br />recommendation received from the Personnel Committee. <br /> <br />Further discussion: <br /> <br />Motion carried/failed. Voting yes <br />MotiOn no <br /> <br />It~B: Police Labor Neootiations:' <br /> <br />~e City Administrator will discuss this verbally with Council at the <br />meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />