Laserfiche WebLink
City Administrator Hagen clarified that this would focus on using an accessory building for the <br />home occupation. <br />Councilmember Howell asked what it is to the City how someone uses their property if the use is <br />compatible with not disrupting people and remains safe. <br />Mayor Kuzma added that this is why things would come back to Council to discuss. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff noted that if it is not a restricted use then there is potentially no <br />recourse to say no. He emphasized the importance of outlining what is or is not allowed. <br />Planning Manager Larson stated that other cities treat these as interim uses where there is a <br />timeframe for these permits, with the intent of getting the business up and running from your home <br />and then moving it to a commercial or industrial space. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the building code guides an accessory building. <br />City Administrator Hagen stated that building code only addresses the mention of construction. <br />Councilmember Specht agreed that the size does not matter as much as the activity. <br />City Administrator Hagen stated that they will work on these updates to be brought back to <br />Council. <br />There was a consensus of the Council. <br />3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br />3.01: Review Future Topics/ Calendar <br />Noted. <br />4. MAYOR / COUNCIL / STAFF INPUT <br />None. <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br />The Work Session of the City Council was adjourned at 6:55 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Brian S. Hagen <br />City Council Work Session / May 9, 2023 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />