Minutes - Council - 04/25/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Elvig inquired if there is a plan for how Helium Street will be blended from the older, narrower street with lesser grade to the wider, brand new street. Public Works Director Olson indicated this issue will be included on the agenda of a Public Works Committee meeting for discussion. City Attomey Goodrich advised the motion should include a contingency that there is a successful exchange of land between the developer and the City. Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to rescind Resolution #06-02-064 granting final plat and final site plan approval to Meadow, and to adopt Resolution #06-04-138 granting revised final plat and final site plan approval to Meadow, contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated April 19, 2006 and the April Engineering Memo dated April 20, 2006, the Developer entering into a development agreement with the City, and the successful exchange of land between the Developer and the City. Further discussion: Councilmember Elvig inquired if there is a concern regarding the land exchange. City Attorney Goodrich replied there is not a disagreement; there just needs to be a determination how to complete the exchange. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Olson, Elvig, Jeffrey, Pearson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. Community Development Director Trudgeon requested the Council return to the discussion of Brookfield Second Addition. Case #7: Request for Final Plat Approval of Brookfield Second Addition; Case of Oakwood Land Development (Continued Discussion) Public Works Director Olson explained this case was discussed further with the applicant and the property owner to the south of the development. The adjacent property owner had concerns about density transition and drainage. The drainage will not change, and will drain to the north. It was discussed that the cul-de-sac would be offset to the east. Lot 1 would become a buildable lot, and the outlots would be placed on Lots 12 and 13. The developer has agreed to provide additional landscaping and trees along the southern edge of the outlot and the southern edge of the newly created lot. The density transitioning vegetation would stop at the existing lot. This met with the concurrence of the property owner to the south. The consensus of the Council was that staff should proceed in working with the developer and the landowner to the south regarding the configuration of the outlots. Community Development Director Tmdgeon indicated the Staff Review Letter states that Lot 1, Block 4 and Lot 13, Block 2 should be platted as outlots, which was included as a contingency of the motion that was adopted. City Council / April 25, 2006 Page 16 of 23