05/04/06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5. That undue hardship or practical difficulty will/will not result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, such as exceptional topographic conditions. 6. That the variance request is/is not the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. 7. That literal interpretation of the regulations for cul-de-sac length would/would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district. 8. That the special conditions causing the undue hardship do/do not result from the actions of the Applicant. 9. That if granted, the variance will/will not grant special privilege that is denied to other owners of lands, s'guctures or buildings in the same district. 10. That, if granted, the variance will/will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 11. That, if granted, the variance will/will not unreasonably diminish or impair established property values with the neighborhood. 12. That, if granted, the variance will/will not increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety. 13. Th~i~ if granted, the variance will/will not have the effect of allowing a use prohibited in the applicable zoning district 14. That, if granted, the variance will/will not permit a lesser degree of public health, safety and general welfare protection than established by City Code. 15. That, if granted, the variance will/will not permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. 16. That, if granted, the variance will/will not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member Levine, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereofi and the following voted against the same: and the following abstained: Resolution #06-05~ 6 Page 2 of 3