My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/04/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/04/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:37 AM
Creation date
4/28/2006 11:05:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/04/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For example, the composite development <br />map (Figure 3) for the town of 6rear Bardng~on <br />depicts the pattern of future developable <br />land, the land with absolute development <br />constraints, and the {and with partial develop- <br />ment constraints. The map also includes three <br />tabtes: the percentage of land in each zoning <br />district, current demographics and bui[dout <br />projection~,kJ:ompadng buildout values with <br />those from the year t990 and zooo. and sum- <br />mary of bu~Tdout impacts. <br /> <br />MASS AUDUBON SPRAWL ANALYSIS <br />The Massachuse~s Audubon Society used <br />buildout analysis and U.S. Census housin~ <br />permit data to illustrate two "s~rawl frontiers." <br />3~tey found high teve{s of development in <br />areas of relatively Iow bui[dout west of 1-495 <br />and in [ower southwestern Massachusetts. <br />This combination of high r~tea of construction <br />with relatively unbuilt land acts as a Sl3~awl <br />frontier pushing its way west and southeast <br />acrosa the state Isee F~[ure 4). While hi§h <br />construction leve~s on Cape Cod proceed <br />despite a high level of buildout there, this was <br />attributed to ongoing in~l[ and teardown <br />development. <br /> <br />CONDUCTING A BUILDOUT ANALYSIS <br />Buildout analysis can be done manually or on <br />a computer. The use of hand-drawn overlays <br />to snow what a landscape could look like and <br />mathematical calculations to tabulate what its <br />resutting population could be is described [n <br /> <br />Jeff Lacy's l'ne Manual of guild-Out Analysis. <br />The use of a GIg computer mappin[ program <br />and a computer database and spreadsheetS <br />increases the efficiency and consistency of <br />bui[dout analysis, as described in the <br />Massachusetts buildout program. <br /> Localities consider[ns conduct[n§ a <br />buildout analysis need to ask themselves a <br />number of questions. How would they <br />use a buildout analysis? What method is <br />best suited to their needs? What data are <br />available? <br /> <br />future problems}; the level of detail <br />needed (e.g., a parcel Ieve( or a zonin§ dis- <br />ir[ct level, only resiqential development or <br />ali development); and the time pedod to <br />be studied {e.g.. complete buitdout when- <br />ever that occurs or the level of bui[dout at <br />some future pedods, such as so- or ao- <br />year increments). For example, <br />Meck[enbul3 County analyzed the areas <br />adjacent to its streams because it was con- <br />cerned with the impact of future develop- <br />ment on flooding. It used parcel-level data, <br />which were needed as inputS to the flood <br /> <br />IBuiidout and Sprawl Frontier 2000-27 02 <br /> <br /> m <br />m <br /> / <br /> <br />/ RelaOon~ip beme~ build~ ~~ <br />/ housing m <br /> <br />ID(PELTED USE <br />Buildout analyses can be used to assess <br />and amend development regulations, <br />including zoning and subdivision ordi- <br />nances, which may contribute to the poten- <br />tial of future disasters. They can be used to <br />revise a comprehensive plan in order to <br />build consensus on an alternative vision of <br />the future community. They can be used to <br />create a greenprint plan based on an <br />assessment of the potentia[ damage to natu- <br />ral systems from proiected development. <br /> The desired use wil~ influence the analy- <br />sis area (e.g., the whole iurisdi~:tion or only a <br />portion where deveiooment is likeiy to cause <br /> <br />model and the HAZUS model. It looked at flJ[I <br />buildout under its adopted district plans. <br /> <br />SUITABLE METHOD <br />Choosing a suitable method for a bui[dout <br />analysis will involve issues such as the staff, <br />time, and budget available to cam/it out. <br />Buildout analyses can be relatively simpie or <br />very complex. Whether they are done manu- <br />ally with hand-drawn overlays or with a com- <br />puter-based Gig pm~rem will depend upon <br /> <br /> The U.S. Environmental protection <br />Agency's Green Communities program lays out <br /> <br />ZONINGPRACTICE 3.06 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.