Agenda - Council - 03/08/1988 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT COhDITIONAL USE FERF/T BREEZY OUTDOOR, INC. 1. That Breezy Outdoor, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a conditional use permit to construct an advertising sign. 2. That the Applicant appeared before the Ramsey Planning and Zoning Con~ission for a public hearing pursuant to Sections 170.013D and 170.054 of the Ramsey City Code on February 2, 1988 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as part of these findings by reference. 3. That the subject property is generally known as 7009 Highway ~,10 N.W. and is legally described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Kovar Addition, Anoka County, ~nnesota 4. That the subject property is located in the B-1 B~siness District and is approximately one acre in size. 5. That the Applicant is requesting a conditional use pemit to construct an advertising sign on the subject property. 6. That the Applicant is proposing to construct a two-faced advertising sign with each face approximately 300 square feet in size. 7. Tnat Section 170.054 of the City Code requires that advertising signs shall be constructed either on the site of the subject activity on the si~n or within 2,500 feet of the su,bject activity advertised on the sign. 8. That Section 170.054 of the City Code also requires that all advert/sing signs must obtain a conditional use permit from the City prior to construction. 9. That the subject property is currently the site of a used automobile sales operation and the Applicant plans to rent the subject property from the ~er. 10. That the adjacent properties are located %,ithin the B-1 Business District. 1!. ~nat the proposed sign will not increase traffic into or from the s'.~bj eot property. 12. Tnat the proposed sign %~i!1 not be ~nduly dangerous or detrimental to persons working in the vicinity of the proposed sign. 13. That the proposed sign will not substantially impair the use of surrounding properties. 14. Tnat the proposed sign will not be harmonious with and in accordance %~ith the specific objectives of the City's Compreh~.sive Plan and Zoning Ordinance.