Agenda - Council - 05/09/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Attorney Goodrich advised the motion that was acted on should be amended to give staff- discretion to proceed with the determination of the outlots for the temporary cul-de-sac based on ', '. wnerto the soutlt! . conversations with the developer anu rile rondo The motion acted on under Case No. 7: Request for Final Plat Approval of Brookfield Second Addition; Case of Oakwood Land Development; was amended as follows: Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to adopt resolution #06- Ve the final lat of Brookfield Second Additi~.~ con~.'.~_gent upon compliance with 04-137 to appro . . P .... *--'~ ~ 2006 ~'~l~ the: ~)~vel°per entering' into a the Ci Staff Review better ua~e~ mJ-~ ~', '5..-~, .>.~:* · - Devel;~ment Agreement with the City, and with staff tatzayel atscretton · ' n of the outlots for the temporary ~¢li3e'sa¢::baied ~n ,c. onversations with the developer and the landowner to the soutia. ~ ;:?, · ' Votin Yes: Mayor Gamec, '~)~n~b'ers PearSbn; ~00k~ E!vig, Jeffrey, Olson, and Strommen. Voting 1~o: rqone. . . . f the Council was to direct staff to Pi-d~ide 'thee ~!! wath further mformatmn The consensus o · - - ~te~ii/ei:l ~ugh further discussions the comfimirat~on of the temporary outlots, a~ u, with the developer and the lanuowner to m* ~- - '. Case #9: Introduce Ordinance to;'kme'~d se~t?n 8.35 (R~.ulation of Single Family Dwellings to be moved in'tO ~r'with¢ the City ~ ~'~-~ ? ~-~i~:-od ~OVino a dwelhng ~nto or vathin the Community Development Direc~r_:irn~tge,;nM~x~..'.~;~;e~.' ~ere are no standards or perm,t City r~t.uires a Dwelling Moving_Perm [ . .~: requirements to move a dwitJing.~out of the Ci.ty or (.ofmoving an accessory building into, within, or out of City limitS~ Curre~dY, the DMP process reqmre that the request is presented to the Plarming Commissio~':hnd them ultimately to City Council. The process requires · - ~':'- :,' ~' ---':--*;"n is received until City Council votes on · · ' llortt ttle tlttle' aB. approximately two monks .~.. : . · · ,'" ~ thin-s the matte ! The'/ 'rop6S a'revisions't° the ordinance are ~rnecl at accompusmng several g · First, P~'~i~ns: have b~e~ ~cluded th~iit 4ksuld'require a Moving Permit to be obtained from the "' ' '- ~' ' '"": '-' ed - Building Division if a dwelling were to be mov out of the City or if an accessory building were to%e' m6%ed into, within,'~{ 0ut °ithe City.' After conferring with the Building Official, this type will allow the Cii i:iO ,erify, prior to a building being raised and relocated, that ail ~ttihtiesl l~ve been properly sl~t': 0ff and/or capped and that the foundation is properly removed d Secondl , th~ entire DMP process would be streamlm, e~.by~eln'nm.,atm,,g~_~e_ and/or,~backfille - Y.:" . - ' ' ' O I..1 council. WflIiU need for:the request.to be presenled to ootla the Planning Comm~ssmn an ty staff would'n~TM h/i;vk th~' ab~i{Y to administratively approve or deny a DMP application, the : ri{~ffa'CUi-rently used to evaluate this type of request would remain intact. Mr. conditions and c ' ' ; -. .... ~ -do.-tion of the ordinance to amend Trudgeon advised the:Planmng comm~ssmn recommeuu~ ~ Section 8.35 of City Code as proposed. Councilmember Strommen noted the procedures for obtaining a DMP do not include information · ~for moving -a,~h acturc 9trt of the ~City. City Council / April 25, 2006 Page 17 of 23 -245-