Laserfiche WebLink
work, it would be helpful to establish some projections on the estimated annual cost for this <br />work. Staff therefore recommends that it be directed to prepare an estimate of the cost for future <br />street~ reconstruction~ prior' to' establishSng' an- assessment" po}icy. In: the' interim staff would' <br />recommend that the Committee recommend to City Council that street reconstruction associated <br />with the installation of sewer and water be fully assessed as an element of the utility installation. <br />Finally, staff recommends that the redevelopment of Now and Then Estates be reconsidered in <br />August 2006 after Oakwood has had an opportunity to formalize their agreements with interested <br />property owners. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked if there are other streets in the City that may need to be labeled for this <br />type of street reconstruction. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler replied 160m Avenue has one of the worst street conditions in the City. He <br />noted staffrates the condition of the City's roads yearly. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec commented the key is the policy, rather than the areas. He noted the large cost <br />residents would incur from a total reconstruction project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson indicated she has difficulty with the idea of assessing 100% for a <br />reconstruction, when within that year the City might have paid 50% on an overlay. <br /> <br />The Committee discussed possible costs of street reconstruction projects and how assessments <br />could be determined. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler suggested the amount of assessment could include a factor of whether the road <br />has gq.ne through its projected life. The roads that fail prematurely could be handled differently <br />as far as the cost of reconstruction. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig requested further input regarding staff s recommendation. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated other cities seem to be comfortable assessing in the range of <br />$5,000 to $7,000. He suggested tailoring the assessment policy to fall in that range. He noted <br />occasionally there are huge lots with the potential to be subdivided, and this issue has been raised <br />by many residents at public hearings. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec noted at one time the policy stated that a lot with large acreage could be assessed <br />four times, since it could be subdivided. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied that policy has not been followed since 1990. He noted it was <br />the policy when a lot of the City's streets were being paved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig suggested a timefi'ame be applied, such as a charge, being applied to a <br />proper~y that is split within a certain number of years of the street reconstruction. <br /> <br />'Couneilmembcr'Olso~ concurred. -She noted/n'the past P, za~sey h~s~'b~:n a.rural commurdty ~nd <br />people have had large acreages to live on. Ho~vever, now more and more of the time property is <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / March 21, 2006 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br /> -287- <br /> <br /> <br />