Agenda - Council - 05/09/2006 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Attorney Goodrich advised the motion that was acted on should be amended to 'give staff discretion to proceed with the determination of the outlots for the temporary cul-de-sac based on conversations with the developer and:the laridowner to the south,' The motion acted on under Case No. 7: Request for Final Plat Approval of Brookfield Second Addition; Case of Oakwood Land Development; was amended as follows: Motion by Councilmember Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to adopt resolution #06- 04-137 to approve the final plat of Brookfield Second Addition contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated April 21, 2006, and the Developer entering into a Development Agreement with the City, and with staff to have discretion to proceed with the determination of the outlots for th~ temporary cul-de-sac based on conversations with the developer and the landowner to the south. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilraembers Pearson, Cook, Elvig, Jeffrey, Olson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. The consensus of the Council was to direct staff to provide the Council with further information regarding the configuration of the temporary outlots as determined through further discussions with the developer and the landowner to the south. Case #9: Introduce Ordinance to Amend Section 8.35 (Regulation of Single Family Dwellings to be moved into or within the City Community Development Director Trudgeon explained moving a dwelling into or within the City r.e.quires a Dwelling Moving Permit (DMP). However, there are no standards or permit requirements to move a dwelling out of the City or for moving an accessory building into, within, or ot/t of City limits. Currently, the DMP process requires that the request is presented to the Planning Commission and then ultimately to City Council. The process requires approximately two months from the time an application is received until City Council votes on the matter. The proposed revisions to the ordinance are aimed at accomplishing several things. First, provisions have been included that would require a Moving Permit to be obtained from the Building Division ifa dwelling were to be moved out of the City or if an accessory building were to be moved into, within, or out of the City. After conferring with the Building Official, this type of permit will allow the City to verify, prior to a building being raised and relocated, that all utilities have been properly shut off md/or capped and that the foundation is properly removed and/or backfilled. Secondly, the entire DMP process would be streamlined by eliminating the need for the request to be presented to both the Planning Commission and City Council. While staff would now have the ability to administratively approve or deny a DMP application, the conditions and criteria currently used to evaluate this type of request would remain intact. Mr. Trudgeon advised the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the ordinance to amend Section 8.35 of City Code as proposed. Councilmember Strommen noted the procedures for obtaining a DMP do not include information for mrrvinga'stmcture out'of~e C~. City Council / April 25, 2006 Page 17 of 23 -{]1-