Laserfiche WebLink
(~ainnan Z~,~rman noted that in order for the southwest parcel to access <br />the cul-de-sac, Mr. Gordon would have to provide for a 66 foot easement <br />extending frc~ that cul-de-sac and obtain a variance to street frontage or <br />construct an extension of 180th Avenue N.W. into his plat. <br />Motion by Chairman Zimmerman and seconded by Commissioner Howell to <br />recommend that Mr. ~arley Gordon subdivide his property utilizing the minor <br />platting process; that no soil borings, topography or perk tests would be <br />necessary'; and that the plat be reviewed by the Park and Recreation <br />Commission. <br /> Amendment by Commissioner Howell and seconded by Commissioner Shumway to <br /> request in this case, and to establish as standard Planning and Zoning <br /> operating procedure, that all minutes pertaining to a case from it's <br /> initiation to it's completion will be included as background material each <br /> time a case is addressed. <br /> Further Discussion: The Commission requested an opportunity to review Mr. <br /> Gordon' s sketch plan. <br /> <br />Chairman Zimmerman, Cu~,~ssioner$ Shum~ay, <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br /> <br />Amendment carried. Voting Yes: <br />Terry, Howell, TmDue and Holm. <br />Hendriksen. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners Shumway, <br />Terry, Howell, LaDue and Holm. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner <br />Hendriksen. <br />~ase ~3: Request For A Conditional Use Permit TO Construct And ~Operate .~ <br /> ~n C~:f~ce And Warehouse For An Electrical Contracting <br /> ~usiness: Case Of Mr. Jeff Erikson: <br /> Mr. Erikson reviewed the history of his case. Mr. Erikson referred to the <br /> proposed findings of fact and stated that he disagrees with the fact <br /> indicating that the office/warehouse will increase traffic to the area. <br /> Mr. Erikson explained that he does not anticipate business operations to <br /> increase to any more than what it has been over the past 12 years at this <br /> location. <br /> Disc'ussion ensued regarding the accessory building height (22'-23'), the <br /> height of the principal structure (2-story home), the location of the <br /> accessory struc~ure, the proximity neighboring structures. <br /> to table <br /> Co.n~al~_~oner <br /> Motion by . ~==~ Holm and seconded by Commissioner Howell <br /> action on ~r. Erikson's recuest for a conditional use permit until such <br /> time as a site plan is submitted indicating the number, placement and <br /> elevation of existing buildings on the site along with t~notos. <br /> Further Discussion: Ms. Norris noted that the existing business is <br /> grendfathared in but to expand that business (a non-conforming use) from <br /> the home into the accessory structure would require a conditional use <br /> permit. Co~.~missioner Shumway stated he opposes the approval of the <br /> Planning and zoning Commission/~arch 17, 1988 <br /> <br />Page5 of 8 <br /> <br />/3 <br /> <br /> <br />