Laserfiche WebLink
Bolton & Menk, Inc. <br />Proposal QTB175606 <br />April 4, 2023 <br />Page 2 <br />(4) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not <br />contaminated. <br />Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of <br />the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower <br />purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? <br />(5) <br />Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property. <br />Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property <br />that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or <br />threatened releases? For example, <br />(a) Do you know the past uses of the property? If so, please explain. <br />(b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? <br />If so, please explain. <br />(c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? <br />If so, please explain. <br />(d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? <br />If so, please explain. <br />(6) The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the <br />property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation. <br />Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious <br />indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? If so, <br />please explain. <br />BRAUN <br />INTERTEC <br />