Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember votes related to franchise fees,they can act on that. She noted that the City had a <br /> study completed by the University of Minnesota, which provided a lot of information. She <br /> recognized that the study requested by the Charter Commission was shorter because of the limited <br /> budget available, but also provided information. She commented that it would seem that some <br /> people did not like the results of those studies and therefore keep coming back to request more. <br /> She asked where this is coming from as she has not been contacted by anyone about franchise fees. <br /> She stated that she does not want to keep rehashing this if it is the agenda of just one or two <br /> members. <br /> Commissioner Rusert recapped that the franchise fee was enacted and then taken away. She asked <br /> if the funds had been misappropriated. <br /> Commissioner Bendtsen commented that the Council used the franchise fee to raise funds because <br /> they wanted to spend the property tax funds in other ways. <br /> Chairperson Field stated that the Council has supported and then not supported the use of franchise <br /> fees because membership of the Council changed. He stated that franchise fees could be seen as <br /> an unregulated income source. <br /> Commissioner Deemer commented that there is a lack of knowledge related to how other <br /> communities use their franchise fees. <br /> Commissioner Moore commented that she would not want to take options away from the City <br /> Council that could potentially be used. She stated that if people do not support the actions of the <br /> Councilmember representing their ward, they can vote as such in the next election. <br /> Commissioner Rusert stated that the franchise fee would seem to be another source of revenue, <br /> noting that the City already has sources of revenue and if additional funds are needed perhaps the <br /> City should review its spending. <br /> Chairperson Field recognized that the Charter Commission was limited in the amount of funding <br /> available for the study completed. He noted that some of his questions were not answered in the <br /> study. <br /> Commissioner Deemer commented that the intent of the franchise fee was to complete road <br /> projects without assessment,noting that the Council seems to have found a way to do that without <br /> the franchise fee. He stated that it would seem pointless because the City has found a way to fund <br /> the roads without the franchise fee. <br /> Chairperson Field stated that it has come and gone and could come back again. He believed that <br /> there should be some type of regulation on the use of franchise fees but did not believe the <br /> Commission had enough information to take action on that. <br /> Commissioner Bendtsen withdrew his previous motion. <br /> Charter Commission/February 2,2023 <br /> Page 6 of 7 <br />