Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked what the path forward is for the bank now that their requests <br />have been denied. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Larson stated that typically an applicant cannot reapply for the same thing for <br />a year unless there are substantial changes made. <br /> <br />Sienna Wegehaupt, Puetz Design & Build, mentioned that one of the challenges faced with this <br />site is that there are multiple fronts to the building. She stated that they were trying to respect both <br />the west and the south edges since they would be on the front of the road, and kept the drive-thrus <br />on the north. She shared the reasons why the facades ended up the way that they did as there is <br />essentially no back of the building. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated that the motions have failed and this will go back to the developer. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen added that the ordinance did pass and will go into effect 30 days after <br />publication. He stated that it is now up to the applicant if they wish to continue discussions on the <br />project. <br />7.02: Adopt Resolution #23-158 Approving Use Restriction Agreement on Part of Outlot <br />A, Ramsey Properties Addition <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan reviewed the Staff report in regard to a use restriction <br />on a portion of Outlot A. He shared Staff’s recommendation of approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked how much of the land in question the hotel will sit on and what <br />portion the Norhart project would sit on. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan showed on the site map where the hotel and the Norhart <br />project will sit. He discussed other potential developments in the area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked if this were to be denied if this would cause the applicant to pull <br />out of the project. <br /> <br />Emily Alerga, the applicant, shared that they are fully invested into this project. She explained that <br />the reason they brought this to the EDA to look into is due to some of the dynamics that have <br />shifted in the City, especially with the dome project. She stated that they wanted to have security <br />with so much vacant land around the parcel. She noted that their original request was for a ten year <br />restriction; however, the EDA wanted to shorten the restriction. She shared that their goal is to <br />make this work for them and the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked if Norhart is on board with this request. <br /> <br />Ms. Alerga said yes and explained that both party’s legal teams have looked over this. She stated <br />that the proposal brought forward to the Council is from Norhart. <br /> <br />City Council / July 11, 2023 <br />Page 14 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />