Laserfiche WebLink
/ <br /> <br /> Councilmember Cox introduced the following resolution and moved for its <br /> adoption: <br /> <br />RESOL~ON %85-87 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION I{~_4~DIN~ ACQUISITION OF PERMITS FOR TRACK CROSSINGS ON BURLINGTON <br />NC~ITHERN TRACKS FOR NOR~IFORK ADDITION WI~{ CONTINGENCIES <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, developers have sut~itted a proposed development (Northfork <br />Addition) adjacent to State Highway %10 and the Burlington Northern railroad <br />tracks; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said develouuent has been reviewed by the City Planning and <br />Zoning Commission and they have recommended approval; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, said proposed development proposes that Andrie Street NW <br />connect to State Highway %10 and cross the Burlington Northern railroad tracks; <br />and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, acquisition of the permits for the access to State Highway <br />#10 and the track crossing for the Burlington Northern railroad tracks could be <br />very time consuming and costly; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, there are no guarantees that said permits will be approved. <br /> <br />NC$q ~IIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY T~E CITY (DUNClL OF ~{E CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA <br />(DUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br /> 1) That the developers of Northfork Addition shall pay for all costs <br />incurred in acquiring the necessary permits for the access to State Highway %10 <br />and the Burlington Northern railroad crossing. <br /> <br /> 2) That said costs shall be charged against the developers' escrow <br />account for platting. <br /> <br /> 3) That the developers shall supplement said escrow account <br />$1,000.00 prior to the City of Ramsey proceeding. <br /> <br /> 4) That the City Engineer is directed to perform the work as <br />necessary upon developers escrow payment. <br /> <br /> 5) That the adoption of this resolution does not imply plat approval <br />of the Northfork P.U.D. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />Councilmember Sorteberg and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted <br />in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers COx, Sorteberg and Schlueter <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman <br /> <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br /> <br />