Laserfiche WebLink
or_ t~n~Jer of the Cable Communications Franchise Ordinance <br /> to Nc)i'~'h Central Cable Communications, L.P., or to any other <br /> ent:~ y c,~ in~ividual. <br /> <br />5. Thai t}~.J~'~ approval is specifically conditioned upon pa~ent <br /> <br /> in f.~]~} ~:,:.[or to an actual closing of the stock sale transaction <br /> in Jur,~ ~986 of all expenses incurred by Co~ission and <br /> City ~]~,ted to the Request for Approval of Transfer dated <br /> February 4, ]986, including those related expenses incurred <br /> pri(~:,: to, ~.~ebruary 4, 1986, but incurred in preparation for <br /> the :,ec~J gt of the Request for Approval. <br /> <br />6. Tha~ thi~-~ approval, is specifically conditioned upon the <br /> <br /> unders~tandinq that any changes or modifications in the cable <br /> co~.u~r~:Lcations Franchise ordinance or cable co~unications <br /> system (.~'~ place or proposed) which are subject to regulation <br /> or (~or,;~'~]. by City and/or Co~ission shall not be made without <br /> the pr i~,:t review and approval of City and/or Co~ission <br /> pur~uat~'L Lo such procedures as are contained in the cable <br /> conmu~r~icaLions Franchise or othe~ise applicable law. <br /> The abov~t listed resolution was moved by Council Member <br /> <br />__:;c~,~:~, , and duly seconded by Council Member <br /> <br /> [,4~./ )~ '{~Ji..mi~l~, Councilmembe~s Cox, Reimann, Schlueter and Sorteberg <br /> <br />The fo]_~lov,':i,'~g Co~ncil Members voted in the negative: <br /> <br />Passed ~,nf ~cl~)pted this 29th <br /> <br />day of April , 1986. <br /> <br />~ C~t~' Administrator <br /> <br /> <br />