|
CouncJi~,~b~.z Co× introduced the following resolution and moved
<br />for J.t.s
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION #87-262
<br />
<br />RESOLUTION gi~PROVING PAYMENT FOR EASEMENTS ON ROANOKE STREET N.W.
<br />
<br /> !,H{~;k.}';AS~ the City has undertaken an improvement project
<br />for thc. pu~-p,,,,~e of street and storm sewer improvements on Roanoke
<br />Street F~,!~ ~ wbi. ch project is known as Improvement Project ~87-2;
<br />and
<br />
<br /> W~{E~{EA,q, it is necessary to acquire certain permanent
<br />right.---of~.~,v ca,~;ernent s for construction of the improvement
<br />includ.i,~..4 ~ 16a5 square foot permanent easement and 900 square
<br />foot te~,.v~,:~ry easement ~ which property is owned by Reilley
<br />Es ta te .*: :, ~ pz~,ztnership, AND a 9,554 square foot permanent
<br />easemen~ ;,.nd a 1.5,070 square foot temporary easement from Marie
<br />C~ Skibn~ ¥o h of the. se parcels are adjacent to Roanoke Street
<br />N.W. T~,~ :,? ~ ,.ched surveys show respective easement parcels; and
<br />
<br /> ~.li{EREA,q, the Ci. ty Engineer and City Attorney have
<br />negotJ a~,,c z settlement with Reilley Estates of $400.00 for
<br />paymeni o~ l~,th the temporary easement and permanent easement and
<br />a sett i.c,~tc~,t of $1 ~000.00 for the temporary and permanent
<br />easenmm,q ~,,,,ilb ?,h~ri.e C. ,qkiba; and
<br />
<br /> w}i}';?.EAS, Council finds both of said settlements to be
<br />reasonab!r p,.yments for the damages incurred by the landowners.
<br />
<br />NOW THI~.RF, F(:tl~, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />RAMSEY, ANf~!.A COIINTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows:
<br />
<br /> i) !'hat the. City Administrator is directed to issue a
<br />City c],eci~ ! ~> Reil].ey Estates, a partnership, in the amount of
<br />$400.00 for p ~yumnt of the permanent and temporary easements as
<br />described
<br />
<br /> .') i'hat the City Administrator is directed to issue a
<br />Cjty ch~'.~? t~ Marie C~ Skiba in the amount of $1,000 for payment
<br />of the ~>c'~,,.'~en~ and. temporary easements as described herein.
<br />
<br />The moti~: {:~c i:he adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
<br />scoot, dod 1~¥ Councilmember DeLuca and upon vote being taken
<br />thereon.~ ;in ~ (ilowing voted in favor thereof:
<br />
<br />l~Lembe r Cox
<br />].member DeI,uca
<br />lmember Pearson
<br />1member Sar teberg
<br />
<br />and the f,.>] !.ay;lng voted against the same:
<br /> Resolution #87-262
<br />
<br />Page 1 of 2
<br />
<br />
<br />
|