Laserfiche WebLink
counc:L l[,:~ember DeLuca <br />and mo~e.d '~or' its adoption: <br /> <br />introduced the following resolution <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #89-02- 25 <br /> <br />RESOLUT]ioN ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON SEALCOATING <br />IMPROVEMENT (RODEO HILLS ESTATES) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve the following streets by <br />sealco~ti~g~ <br /> <br />!77th Ave. NoW. between Vanadium St. N.W. and the <br />~sterly terminus of the cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />:178th Lane NoW. between Vanadium St. N.Wo and Uranium <br />s ?~ ~ N. W. <br /> <br />l'!Pth Lane N.W. between Uranium St. N.W. and the east <br />p.i. at boundary of Rodeo Hills Estates. <br /> <br />Lane N.W. between Vandadium St. N.W. and Uranium <br />W. <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />V~madium St. N.W. between Green Valley Road (Co. Rd. <br />~) and 180th Lane N.W. <br /> <br />U:canium St. N.W. between 178th Lane N.W. and the north <br /> boundary of Rodeo Hills Estates. <br /> <br />and to as:i~m~s the benefited property for all or a portion of the <br />cost of the improvement, pursuant to Chapter 210.01 of the City <br />Code. <br /> <br />NOW, THI':[REF()RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANO~ COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br /> 1) !]]hat the proposed improvements be referred to Mr. Pete <br />Raatikka of Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. for the study and <br />that he .[~ J.nstructed to report to the City Council with all <br />conveni~]~t ~;peed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to <br />whethe:~' the proposed improvements are feasible and as to whether <br />they slnou].d best be made as proposed or in connection with some <br />other .i..~pzovement, and the estimated cost of the improvement as <br />recommended ,~ <br /> <br />The mo'i2J(m ~or the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly <br />secondec~ by Councilmember Cich and upon vote being taken <br />thereon~ the roi. lowing voted in favor thereof: <br /> Mayor P, eirnann~ Councilmember DeLuca, Cich, Peterson, and Pearson <br />and the ~i;)l]owing voted against the same: <br /> None <br />and th~ ~!'ol]owing abstained: <br /> None <br />and the f~] ].owing were absent: <br /> Noll,~ <br /> <br /> <br />