Laserfiche WebLink
Cotmcilmcrr~!~r~.r l'earson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #89-08-184 <br /> <br />III,~'S()LUWION RECEIVING REPORT AND <br />WATER, $'FiI~gET AND STORM SEWER <br />(RIVI~YN A V 14NUI!;) <br /> <br />CALLING HEARING ON SEWER, <br />IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #89-13 <br /> <br /> Wi~:tEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Ramsey City Council adopted the <br />13th day et .l~c~ '1989, a report as been prepared by Mr. Pete Raatikka of Hakanson Anderson <br />Associatcs~ fnc. ;,~ith reference to the sewer, water, street and storm sewer improvement of the <br />tbllowing slc,:ci: <br /> <br /> a) <br />bottndary~ <br /> <br />14i,~qyn Avenue N.W. between Sunfish Lake Boulevard N.W. and the east City <br /> <br /> A?,ID WIIEREAS, the report was received by the Ramsey City Council on <br />August 8, l~)~49, which report indicates the following: <br /> <br />i:;~st i i i~] ~.1 [.~( i 'l"O tal Cost of Project <br />I'£sti~ r,a t,~i Total Assessment per Unit <br /> (individual properly cost): <br />I~.sti~ ~¢atc,.t A nnttai Assessment per Unit <br /> 1 (I Year Tem~ <br /> <br />$130,585.00 <br />$ 7,254.72 <br />$ 1,130.29 <br /> <br />N()W T,{I~I~141V()R}5, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF <br />RAMSI4¥, AN(>KA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br /> l) That the Ramsey City Council will consider the sewer, water, street and <br />st(>rtn scwc~' it~p~oYement of such street in accordance with the report and the assessment of <br />abutting propc:rty for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to the Ramsey City <br />Chm'tcr at m~ c.sth~ rated total cost of the improvement of $130,585. <br /> <br /> That a public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the <br />29th day of At~gu:~t, 1989, in the council Chamber of the Ramsey Municipal Center at 7:00 p.m. <br />and [he City A(lmi ~fistrator shall give mailed and pubhshed notice of such hearing and improvement <br /> <br />The m(~tion fo~' lh(; adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />l)cI .uca ami [~ p,m vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and IBc Ibllowi~g voted against the same: <br /> <br />I'q el'B: <br /> <br />and thc follo,x'in g ~4ost~uned. <br /> <br />Norlc <br /> <br /> <br />