Resolution - #89-12-330 - 12/12/1989

Home

Counciln]c,~ fl~c; i'carson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #89-12-330 RESOLU'IIt)N AIJTItORIZING INCREASE IN CITY CONTRIBUTION FOR IlEAl,TI1 ~t~:?;IIRANCE FOR EXEMPT EMPLOYEES FOR 1990 Wlll,;I,~EAS, the City of Ramsey as employer contributed $182.00 per month during thc: yca~ i989 for all employees exempt from the AFSCME bargaining unit as well as employees il;at :~t~¢ members of the AFSCME bargaining unit; and W {I[ER E AS, the AFS CME bargaining unit's employer contribution on health care will bt~ it~cn.asing to $195.00 per month for the year of 1990 and will be continuing the $5,000 lift: ima~nu =<:o for employee only for all City of Ramsey employees; and W ii[EREAS, the administrative staff exempt from AFSCME and AFSCME members h;,vt; b~:,",n consistent regarding employer's contributions on health care benefits and life instu'ance: and W~IEREAS, the Personnel Committee, on December 4, 1989, accepted the recommenda~it,~ ~11' David Hartley, City Administrator, that the employer contribution on health care for e~nl~loyt:c~ exempt fi'om the AFSCME bargaining unit be increased to $195.00 per month and the $5,01)0 iii¢ insurance continue for the year 1990, for David Hartley, Michael Auspos, Sandra Ashley, Mark Banwart, Penny Curtis, Sylvia Frolik, and Kay McAloney. NOW Tlil,;I{!4F,~)RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSE¥', ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: ) l'hat the City Council of Ramsey conf~ms the reco~endation of the Personnel Committe(~ ~o i~-~c re:age the employer contribution for health insurance inclu~ng dependent coverage to $195.00 pc.r' m(~nfl~ and to continue the $5,000 life insurance for employee only for all of the exempt Cn~l)loyc(:~ for 1990. Thc motion a~c th(: adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Pctcrso~ a~d t~p,m ,:ote being taken thereon, the following vot~ in favor thereof: May~ 4: [4city,ann C. Ol I1 lc ~ [ 1 (lt~l ~l }x}r [)c~trsoll Co, mc il ~-,~c~ nl)cr Peterson and the followi~..5 v~)icd against the same: None and the 2fil owen..; ~ ~stai ned: No~c and the follow}n:~ v....t, re absent: