My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Resolution - #90-01-027 - 01/23/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Resolutions
>
1990
>
Resolution - #90-01-027 - 01/23/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/1/2025 2:42:14 PM
Creation date
9/26/2023 12:06:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions & Ordinances
Resolutions or Ordinances
Resolutions
Resolution or Ordinance Number
#90-01-027
Document Date
01/23/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilrnem~ ~i~h introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION 90-01-27 <br />RESOLUT~I¢',Ni,~ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON SEALCOATING <br />IMPROVli;M E~T ( RAMSEY TERRACE ADDITION) <br /> wHE 'E~8,. it is proposed to improve the following s~eets by sealcoating: <br /> a) ~tl~4~nd Avenue N.W. between the Western plat boundary and the Eastern plat <br /> :~ ~O~ndary. <br /> <br /> b) 1.4~th Lane N.W. between ~pton S~eet N.W. and Iodine S~eet N.W. <br /> c) ~pton Street N.W. between 142nd Avenue N.W. and County Road ~116. <br /> d) 7u~ite Street N.W. between 140th Lane N.W. and 142nd Avenue N.W. <br /> e) ~0C i~e Street N.W. between 142nd Avenue N.W. and County Road gl 16. <br /> <br /> : ~ui ~ite Street N.W. between 142nd Avenue N.W. and the Northern plat boundary. <br /> <br /> AND:~H gREAS, to assess the benefitted property for all or a potion of the cost of the <br />improvement,:~ur ;6ant m Chapter 210.01 of the City Code. <br /> <br />NOW THgR~F~RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSES, ~NOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1) That th~ ~P:t~posed improvement be refe~ed to Peter Raati~a, City Engineer, and he is <br /> instruC~d :0 prep~e a feasibility study to the City Council with all convenient speed <br /> adViSing:ti 6 Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is <br /> feasiHe~an I[as to the cost of the project to each affected property owner. The City Engineer <br /> shall al~ c >mment as to whether it should be ~st to be done as proposed or in conjunction <br /> with s0~e )iher improvement. <br /> <br />2) That tk~ a~ve mentioned project shall hereby be refe~ed to as Improvement Project ~90- <br /> <br />The motion fo~'.th adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Peterson and U~m ote being t&en thereon, the follow~g votM in hvor thereof: <br /> Mayor ~ei~ann <br /> Coun~i~et ~r Cich <br /> couneii~el aber Peterson <br /> Cound~ a~r DeLuca <br /> Coun~l~et ~r Pearson <br />and the folloWi~g ~ed against the same: <br /> <br /> None [ <br /> r <br />and the followi~ ~Stained: <br /> None !:: ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.