Laserfiche WebLink
Councihnc~;~i)cr DcLuca introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #90-02-43 <br /> <br />RESOLOTION RECEIVING REPORT <br />SPE(2IFICATI¢)NS ON IMPROVEMENT <br />STREET N.W. BETWEEN COUNTY ROAD <br /> <br />AND ORDERING PLANS AND <br />PROJECT #90-06 (DYSPROSIUM <br />116 AND NOWTHEN BLVD. N.W.) <br /> <br /> Wllt,;REAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Ramsey City Council adopted January 23, <br />1990, a rcpo~I ha~,; been prepared by Mr. Peter Raatikka of Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., <br />wi th rcfcrcT~cc to ,;ealcoating improvement ( Dysprosium Street N.W. between County Road 116 <br />and Nowlhc~ Blv~l. N.W.); and <br /> <br /> WItEi4EAS, the report was received by the Ramsey City Council on February 13, <br />1990, which -~'cp,)r¢: J ndicates the following: <br /> <br /> imated total cost of project <br />F. stimat~ total assessment per unit <br />(individual property cost) <br />Esim~atcd annual assessment per unit <br /> 3 year term <br /> <br />$6,790.00 <br /> <br />$ o.oo <br /> <br />$ o.oo <br /> <br />NOW TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSt,;Y~ ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Thai ih~ t4~m~sey City Council will consider the improvements of sealcoafing of such street <br />in ac¢;ordance with the report and the use of MSA funds for all of the cost of the <br />improvcm..mt pursuant to the Ramsey City Charter at an estimated total cost of the <br />im pro;,cm{'.~t of $ 6,790.00. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />Such i~tq,~vcmen t is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted 23rd <br />day (¢ .hl~tary, 1990. <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />Mr. Peter Raatikka, of Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as the <br />engineer fr,r this improvement. He shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of <br />st~(;h imp ~'~ voln(3n t. <br /> <br />Thc motion for th~.: adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Petcrson and u pt m vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and thc following voted against the same: <br /> <br />Nom~ <br /> <br />and thc lbllowing ,~bstaincd: <br /> <br />No IT C <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br /> <br />