Laserfiche WebLink
Cotmcihnc, mhc:r/')(_:Luc:~ introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #90-02-59 <br /> <br />RI,;S()I, UTI ON ORDERING <br />(IMPR()VEMENT PROJECT <br />N.W. llETWEEN SUNFISH <br />B()UI,EV/~lll) i~.W. <br /> <br />PREPARATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANS <br />#90-11 SUNFISH LAKE DRIVE/147TH STREET <br />LAKE BOULEVARD N.W. AND NOWTHEN <br /> <br />W~,IE RE/1 S, the City has received preliminary plats for Cedar Hills and Chestnut Hills; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br /> WIlEREAS, preliminary approval of the Cedar Hills and Chestnut Hills is pending due <br />to thc nccd For sm;et access to Sunfish Lake Boulevard via Sunfish Lake Drive N.W. (a private <br />road); and <br /> <br /> WIlEllE~ S, the developers of Chestnut Hills and Cedar Hills have petitioned the City to <br />acquire right-~)f~ wi~y for construction of Sunfish Lake Drive; and <br /> <br /> W~ IERI,;,4 S, Sunfish Lake Drive/147th Street N.W. between Sunfish Lake Boulevard <br />N.W. and Nowthc~ Boulevard N.W. is a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Ramsey and is <br />sht)wl~ (m th(: (?ily:s thoroughfi~re plan; and <br /> <br /> WilEREAS, it is proposed to acquire the right-of-way for the construction of Sunfish <br />l~akc, l)riw_',/idTth ;~4.W. with MSA funds; and <br /> <br /> WllF, l~ti;lS, MSA streets and right-of-way to be paid for by MSA funds require <br />approved I~h~s pri~)r tel he expenditure of MSA funds. <br /> <br />N()W TIIEI,tEF()RE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OI,' RAMSI~;Y, ,"~NOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That lb(.: ,~illlJ'ish lake Drive/147th Street N.W. right-of-way plan is hereby ordered in <br />acc:ordm]c:c with the City's thoroughfare plan dated 8/89. <br /> <br />Th~tt b/Ir. I),;te Raatikka of Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as the <br />cngim;(;r oI' this improvement. He shall prepare right-of-way plans for the making of such <br /> <br />Thc mo~ion f;)r th,: adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Pearson m~d t~l~ vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and Iht followingS,, ~ erect against the same: <br /> <br /> <br />