Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmcw&:r I.,eLuca introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #90-05-133 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DEFEATING PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #89-22 - <br />CAROLINE ACRES (BITUMINOUS SURFACING OF XENOLITH STREET <br />N.W. AND iI7gTH LANE N.W.) <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 23rd day of January, 1990, <br />fixed a date l:(~r a Council hearing on the proposed improvement of bituminous surfacing to <br />Caroline Acres Addition (Project #89-22); and <br /> <br />WHEi[~EAS, the required sixty (60) days has elapsed following the public hearing; and <br /> <br /> WIIEI~EAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the heating was <br />given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 13th day of February, 1990 at which time all <br />persons desiring to tx: heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Ramsey City Council has received a petition in opposition to the <br />proposed projec~t signed by nine property owners representing 50 percent of the affected property <br />owners on thc ! 3th day of March, 1990. <br /> <br />NOW TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY <br />OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />That thc p3oposed Improvement Project #89-22 (bituminous surfacing of Xenolith Street <br />N.W. And 178th Lane N.W.) is hereby disallowed as proposed in the Council resolution <br />adopted th~: 23rd day of January, 1990. <br /> <br />2) <br /> <br />The propo~;ed Improvement Project #89-22 may not be considered for a period of one year <br />from Ihe 13th of February, 1990 as stated in Chapter 8 of the Ramsey City Charter. <br /> <br />The motion for th(: adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Peterson and ,.~pon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayo~' I¢chnann <br />Cotmcih-ne~ nber DeLuca <br />Councilme~nber Peterson <br />Co unc ilme~, nber Pearson <br /> <br />and the following, voted against thc same: <br /> <br />and the following a!)stained: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />and the fol-~owing were absent: <br /> <br />Councilmcr,~ber Cich <br /> <br /> <br />