Resolution - #91-08-196 - 08/27/1991

Home

Councilmember Peterson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION #91-08-196 RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND CALLING FOR A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON IMPROVEMENT PROJECT #91-12 (EXTENSION OF SANITARY SEWER AND WATER TO WALTEK, INC.) WHEREAS, the City has received a petition for a feasibility study to consider the improvement of water and sewer extension to Waltek, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has found the petition to be of the correct percentage of lawful signatures of affected property owners; and WHEREAS, the City Administrator has found the petition to be in accordance with the City Charter and Minnesota Statutes concerning local improvements. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: 1) That a certain petition requesting a feasibility study to consider the improvement of water and sewer extension to Waltek, Inc. has been filed with the City Council on August 27, 1991. The petition is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of affected property owners. This declaration is made in conformity to Ramsey City Code Chapter 4.60 and Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. 2) That the petition is hereby referred to Steve Jankowski, City Engineer, and he is instructed to prepare a feasibility study to the City Council with all convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to the cost of the project to each affected property owner. The City Engineer shall also comment as to whether it should best be done as proposed or in conjunction with some other improvement. 3) That the above mentioned project shall hereby be referred to as Improvement Project # 91- 12. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Cich and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Gilbertson Councilmember Peterson Councilmember Cich Councilmember Hardin Councilmember Beyer and the following voted against the same: None and the following abstained: None