Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Musgrove aye <br />Councilmember Riley aye <br />Councilmember Howell aye <br />Councilmember Olson aye <br />Councilmember Woestehoff aye <br />Councilmember Specht aye <br />Mayor Kuzma aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />7.02: Adopt Resolution #23-204 for Counting Write-In Votes for Local Elective Office - <br />Please Note: this case was pulled from Consent 5.12 to become Case 7.2 on the <br />Regular Agenda. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove shared that she requested this item be removed from the Consent <br />Agenda as she wanted to have more discussion on this. She asked if this would affect the Charter. <br />She noted that she has not heard that counting votes has been an issue in the past. She stated that <br />she is not sure what they would need to make this change to require that anyone who is written in <br />on the ballot needs to have given notice to the City beforehand. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen requested that City Attorney Knaak looks into the Charter regulations <br />to see if this needs to be run through the Charter. He explained that up until this year, Staff was <br />required to count all write-in tallies, even if it is a vote that someone made in a joking manner. He <br />noted that statute did address this for higher offices. He shared that this will help eliminate <br />unnecessary steps on election night or the days following. He noted that this also can address <br />someone who is running a write-in campaign but does not file their affidavit of candidacy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that the write-in candidate portion saying that they need <br />to report to the election official has been law for a while now. He noted that the only thing that is <br />changing is the ability to not have to count these votes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that if someone is running a write-in campaign then there is no <br />way that they could win if their votes would not be counted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff said yes and added that if they did not provide notice to the election <br />official then it would be an up for debate election based on the current statute. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak stated that this statute supersedes any requirement that the City may <br />otherwise have. He noted that he would anticipate that most of the election process is at some level <br />filtered through the Charter. He shared that the statute says that if the governing body of a statutory <br />or home rules charter city adopts the resolution. He noted that this applies to both charter cities as <br />well as statutory cities. He stated that if they decide to do this resolution then this resolution will <br />supersede any contrary provision in the Charter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley noted that anytime there is an election there are tons of dates involved for <br />all candidates. He stated that he does not see an issue with having a deadline to let the City know <br />City Council / September 12, 2023 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />