Laserfiche WebLink
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Bonding for Fire Station #1 <br /> <br />City Administrator Jim Norman provided some background information to the Economic <br />Development Authority regarding the fire station project, the budget situation created by levy <br />limits and the manner by which the City came to consider the option of lease revenue bonds to <br />fund the fire station project. He then introduced the City's financial consultant, Sharon Klumpp <br />of Springsted Incorporated. <br /> <br />Ms. Klumpp presented examples from surrounding communities where this method of bonding <br />had been used for similar facilities projects. She described the process and project timeline to <br />members and responded to several questions from members regarding the process and timeline. <br /> <br />Commissioners expressed concerns about the short time to review the agenda prior to the <br />meeting, they requested more information be prepared in the agenda packets in the future, and <br />they wanted some additional assurance that the City Council was comfortable with the EDA <br />exercising these bonding powers. <br /> <br />In addition, the EDA members stated that they were uncomfortable approving the <br />Redevelopment Plan without more specifics regarding the project site, the redevelopment area, <br />and the relationship of "redevelopment" to the subject land that is vacant, and currently used for <br />agricultural purposes. <br /> <br />City Administrator Jim Norman stated that this method of financing had only begun to be <br />considered a month prior to the meeting. The staff turn-around time to schedule the meeting and <br />prepare an agenda was about two weeks. The City was not withholding or delaying <br />communication to the EDA members on this issue. In fact, the City staff made its best effort to <br />bring it before the EDA for consideration as quickly as possible. <br /> <br />Some of the EDA members' legal questions regarding the redevelopment site and plan had to be <br />forwarded to Briggs & Morgan for their response. <br /> <br />Discussion continued regarding the two resolutions before the EDA members for their <br />consideration and action. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wagner and seconded by Councilmember Connolly to adopt <br />Resolution 99-10-190 establishing procedures relating to compliance with reimbursement bond <br />regulations under the internal revenue code. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Scheiber, Commissioner Wagner, <br />Councilmember Anderson, and Councilmember Connolly. Voting No: Commissioner Riley. <br />Absent: Commissioner Hardin and Councilmember Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Wagner and seconded by Councilmember Connolly to table action on <br />the resolution initiating the process for adoption of redevelopment plan with City Council and <br />approving redevelopment project area and plan to a special meeting of the Economic <br />Development Authority at 7:30 a.m. on October 13, 1999 in order for Briggs and Morgan to <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/October 4, 1999 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />