My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/10/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2023
>
Agenda - Council - 10/10/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:28:20 AM
Creation date
10/10/2023 1:25:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/10/2023
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
226
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. 10. <br /> CC Regular Session <br /> Meeting Date: 10/10/2023 <br /> PrimaryStrategic Plan Initiative: Create a positive image for residential neighborhoods,business districts and key <br /> g corridors. <br /> Information <br /> Title: <br /> Adopt Resolution#23-239 Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Additional Square Footage on an Existing <br /> Detached Accessory Structure at 14275 Alpaca St NW(Project No. 23-112); Case of Jay and Carol McDonald <br /> Purpose/Background: <br /> The City has received a Land Use Application from Jay and Carol McDonald(the "Applicant") for a Conditional <br /> Use Permit(CUP) for a proposed addition to an existing detached accessory building on the property located at <br /> 14275 Alpaca Street NW(the "Subject Property"). The application also included a request for a variance to the <br /> driveway setback requirement,which the Planning Commission approved on September 28, 2023. <br /> Notification: <br /> The City attempted to notify property owners, as reflected in the Anoka County Property Records,within 350 feet of the <br /> Subject Property of the Public Hearing, held on September 28, 2023,via standard U.S. mail. A Land Use Application sign <br /> was also placed on the Subject Property. <br /> Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br /> The Subj ect Property is just over three (3) acres in size and is located in the R-1 Residential(MUSA) - 80 <br /> district. The properties to the south and west are also zoned R-1 Residential(MUSA) - 80,while the properties to <br /> the north and east are zoned B-2 Highway Business District. There is an existing, detached accessory building on <br /> the Subj ect Property that is 2,700 square feet in size,which is the maximum size allowed based on the Subject <br /> Property's size per City Code Section 117-349 (Accessory Uses and Buildings). The Applicant is proposing to <br /> construct a fourteen foot by fifty foot(14' x 50') carport on the north side of the existing accessory building. This <br /> would result in an overage of 700 square feet of detached accessory building space, which prompted the need for <br /> a Conditional Use Permit(CUP). <br /> The Applicant has stated that the roof of the carport will begin at the peak of the accessory building's roof. It will <br /> consist of the same material and color as the existing roof. The proposed carport is intended to provide overhead <br /> shelter for a motorhome. The carport will exceed all required setbacks from property lines and from the septic <br /> system and well (while the Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential(MUSA) - 80, this entire neighborhood is <br /> still on private utilities). <br /> The original application was only for a CUP to address additional detached accessory building square footage. <br /> However, as Staff began reviewing the request, it became clear that an existing driveway serving the Subject <br /> Property not only encroached on the required five(5) foot setback from a side property line,but also encroached <br /> onto the neighboring property to the south. This prompted the Applicant to submit another land use application <br /> seeking a variance to the driveway setback standard. This encroachment is not readily visible to the general <br /> public and has no impact on any other properties other than the Subject Property and the adjacent property owner. <br /> The driveway setback serves multiple purposes. First, in general, it keeps impervious surfacing out of drainage <br /> and utlity easements. Secondly, it provides some space for snow storage without impacting neighboring <br /> properties. There are no drainage and utility easements along the southern lot line of the Subject Property(or the <br /> northern boundary of the adjacent parcel). Secondly, as these are acreage lots (minimum of 2.5 acres in size), <br /> there is no impact related to snow storage. The Applicant stated he has spoken with the adjacent'impacted' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.