My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2006
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/01/2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:39:44 AM
Creation date
5/26/2006 2:47:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/01/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />median income- or 80 to 100 units. The recommended building should include underground <br />parking available for an additional fee, and the following common area amenities: commu- <br />nity/party room, media room, exercise room, management office, and individual storage lockers. <br />Also, this community could be built as one larger building, or as two or three smaller buildings. <br />While we recommend a mixed-income building, in the event that the market rate demand is satis- <br />fied by a new community developed elsewhere by a private developer, we recommend continu- <br />ing with a strictly affordable community. This community should have a similar number of units <br />and concept to that as shown in Table 29. <br /> <br />Market Rate Senior Housing <br /> <br />We recommend the development of an independent senior condominium or cooperative facility <br />to satisfy the demand for market rate independent senior housing. We find that the majority of <br />younger~ active seniors are preferring homeownership over rental. Thus, we would not recom- <br />mend an age-restricted market'rate senior rental building. Our recommended concept for a sen- <br />ior condominium or cooperative is shown in Table 30, along with the unit mix, sizes and base <br />pricing. It should be noted that for a cooperative unit, buyers would pay a share cost equal to a <br />portion of the base price (most likely one-third) versus the full base price. <br /> <br />Based on demand levels, we recommend a senior condominium or cooperative with 45 to 55 <br />units in Ramsey. We recommend that the majority of units be one-bedroom plus den or larger, <br />as most seniors will be downsizing from a single-family home and prefer larger units for their <br />possessions, as well as an extra bedroom. Based on the performance of other communities <br />throughout the Metro Area, we recommend base pricing from about $145,000 to $160,000 for <br />one-bedroom units, to $180,000 to $225,000 for two-bedroom units. We do not recommend <br />pricing much higher than this level, as most seniors will be using the equity from the sale of an <br />existing single-family home and will not want to take on a mortgage to finance the new condo- <br />miniurn/cooperative. <br /> <br /> TABLE 30 <br />SENIOR'COOPERATIVE/CONDOMINIUM <br /> <br />CITY OF RAMSEY <br />January 2006 <br /> <br /> No. of Square Recommended Base Price/ <br />Unit Type Units Feet Base Pricing* Sq. Ft. <br />IBR 5% - 5% 825 - 900 $145,000 - $160,000 $176 - $178 <br />IBR+Den 10% - 15% 950 - 1,025 $160,000 - $180,000 $168 - $176 <br />2BR 80% - 85% 1,075 - 1,275 $180,000 - $225,000 $167 - $176 <br /> Total 45- 55 <br /> <br />* For a cooperative, residents would pay a share cost that would be portion of this <br />market value - most likely 33%. <br /> <br />Note: recommended pricing is in 2006 dollars, and can be trended upward by 3.5% <br />annually until opening. <br /> <br /> Source: Maxfield Research, Inc. <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br />MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC. <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.