Laserfiche WebLink
Acting Chairperson Musgrove asked staff to address the responsibility of the City within the right- <br />of-way. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby provided background noting that this development <br />was built prior to incorporation of the City of Ramsey. He explained how these concerns are <br />addressed when they arise. He stated that the cases are brought forward to this committee for input <br />and direction. He stated that if they were doing a street improvement project, they reach out to <br />homeowners to solicit drainage concernsthat could be addressed to the extent possible as part of <br />the street project. He stated that there are situations such as this across the city. He commented <br />that there are miles of streets within the City where ditches hold water for two or three days after <br />a storm event. He stated that the City tries to prevent water from running off city streets onto <br />private property, but in this case, there is no culvertin the west driveway and the ditches are not <br />well defined. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that he believes the opinion of legal counsel would be <br />that the City does not have an obligation in this instance. He commented that this is an <br />uncomfortable situation and noted that there are miles and miles of similar situations. He noted <br />the cost for this project and stated that could potentially be multiplied by 100 houses. He stated <br />that he would not mind taking on these types of projects when it is efficient for the City to do it. <br />He commented that the City completing this as one project is probably more efficient than having <br />the homeowner contract with multiple contractors but stated that he also does not believe the City <br />would be solely responsible for the cost. He stated that the driveway would seem to be a natural <br />break in terms of the cost split. <br />Councilmember Howell stated that she does feel for the homeowners but also recognizes that there <br />is no obligation of the City. She stated that she would support a cost-share if that could be <br />developed and works for both parties. <br />Mr. Mytko asked for details on the 23 percent indirect costs. <br />City Engineer/Public Works Director Westby replied that for City improvement projects the City <br />adds 23 percent indirect costs for required administrative, engineering, finance and legal fees. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that the $32,000 is for the work the contractor would do while <br />the $7,400 would be for the work of staff. <br />Mr. Mytko commented that they are disappointed with how this is going as there are different <br />members involved tonight than have been involved in the past. He stated that last month he felt <br />they had some hope but noted that in honesty they cannot afford any more funds as they are <br />spending between $15,000 and $20,000 to repair their home from the damage incurred. He stated <br />that if the ditch held the water, he would not get water up to his house. He stated that it sounds <br />like even though the City feels it has an obligation to move the water, but because the driveway is <br />there, he would have to participate in the cost. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff explained that his thinking was that the driveway would be a good <br />cutoff in determining the cost-share. He commented that it would be fair for the homeowner to <br />Public Works Committee / July 18, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />