Laserfiche WebLink
7.03: Adopt Ordinance #23-08 to Amend Chapter 4 of the Charter - Nominations and <br /> Elections <br /> City Administrator Hagen reviewed the Staff report concerning the charter amendments for <br /> nominations and elections. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Woestehoff,to waive the City <br /> Charter Requirement that the Ordinance be read aloud and adopt Ordinance 423-08 Amending <br /> Chapter 4 of the City Charter -Nominations and Elections. <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Councilmember Musgrove aye <br /> Councilmember Riley aye <br /> Councilmember Howell aye <br /> Councilmember Olson aye <br /> Councilmember Specht aye <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff aye <br /> Mayor Kuzma aye <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 7.04: Adopt Resolution#23-223 approving the Haviland Fields EAW,Findings of Fact,and <br /> Record of Decision. - Please Note: this case was moved from the Consent Agenda - <br /> Case 5.18 -to the regular agenda - Case 7.4. <br /> Councilmember Riley shared that he had this case pulled as he would like to have this sent back <br /> to the filer as he does not agree with all of the findings and this needs to be reworked. He noted <br /> that it should focus on the traffic study, findings, and conclusion as he has major problems with <br /> these items. <br /> Planning Manager Larson shared that the environmental review document is something that is <br /> required for larger projects. He explained that this is a planning tool that analyzes the potential <br /> impact of a development on the environment. He stated that these documents are considered City <br /> documents that the project proposer puts together for Staff review. He noted that this document <br /> was reviewed by Staff and shared that after some back and forth, Staff thought that the analysis <br /> was to a point that it was done well. He shared that after this it goes out for a 30 day public comment <br /> period which allows anyone to comment on the document and changes are then made to the <br /> document after these comments. He stated that if there are specific things in this traffic study that <br /> would warrant further study then they can direct the project proposer to look at these things. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated that he questions the peak number of trips based on the number of <br /> multi-family households that are involved. He added that he also questions the suggestion that <br /> there are no road improvements required. He stated that he feels that this road system is already at <br /> maximum capacity before adding over 400 households. <br /> City Council/ September 26, 2023 <br /> Page 13 of 16 <br />