Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/02/1990

Home

CASE #3 REQUEST FOR SKETCH PLAN REVIEW OF FAYE ADDITION; CASE OF FAYE CONSTRUCTION, B.B. CHAPMAN By: Sylvia Frolik, Acting Community Development Director Background: As you recall, the Commission last reviewed the proposed sketch plan for Faye Addition on September 4, 1990. The 103 acre subdivision was proposed to consist of a combination of single family urban residentidal, multi-family urban residential and commercial development. At that time the Commission raised a number of concerns regarding: a) Future of Outlots A and B - will there be an exchange with the County for additional property adjacent to Hwy. #10; b) Documentation of previous City action regarding Duane Lundeen's request for residence in the B-1 Business District; c) Explanation of density standards for developing in Airport Safety Zone B; d) Access to the adjacent Kelly property; e) Development of commercial property more than 1,000 feet south of Hwy. #10; f) Alternatives to developing multi-family residential adjacent to Riverside West. On September 21, 1990, the developer submitted to City Staff a revised sketch plan for Faye Addition dated September 19, 1990 that replaced the proposal for multi-family residential with single family urban residential development. It also reduced Outlots A and B to one 5.3 acre outlot to be dedicated to the homeowners association as private open space. With respect to access to the Kelly property, the developer is proposing that there currently is a private easement in place south from Hwy. #10 to the Kelly property. If the Kelly property is acquired for Anoka County Regional Park, then the access is no longer necessary and the easement would be vacated. If the Kelly property is not acquired by the County, then the private easement can be replaced with an easement from the southernmost street in Faye Addition to the Kelly property. With respect to continuing the regional trail system past the Kelly property, that trail link would be provided by the County if the County acquires that property; if the County does not acquire the property, then the developer of that property would be responsible for providing that trail link through park dedication requirements. One concern of City Staff with the newly revised sketch plan is the number of cul-de-sacs proposed and this should be discussed by the Commission. The following items are enclosed for your information: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) J) k) l) m) Site location map City Engineer's Review dated July 27, 1990 City Landscape Architect's Review dated July 27, 1990 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated August 7, 1990 Park & Recreation Commission meeting minutes dated August 8, 1990 Letter from DNR dated August 16, 1990 Letter from Anoka County Department of Parks and Recreation dated August 21, 1990 Letter from Rand Kluegel, EQB, dated September 7, 1990 Revised sketch plan dated September 19, 1990 Letter from B.B. Chapman dated September 25, 1990 City Engineer's review dated September 26, 1990. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting minutes dated May 5, 1987 regarding Duane Lundeen's request for a conditional use permit to have a residence in a B-1 Business District. City Council meeting minutes and findings of fact dated May 26, 1987 regarding Duane Lundeen's request for a conditional use permit to have a residence in a B- 1 District. lC}