|
PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
<br />
<br /> ORDINANCE/~91 -'5
<br />
<br /> CITY OF RAMSEY
<br /> i' .. ANoKACOUNTY
<br /> . STATE OF MINNESOTA
<br /> AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 4 WHICH IS
<br /> KNOWN AS THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND
<br /> ' IMPROVEMENTS, CHAPTER OF THE CITY
<br /> CODE.
<br /> : AN C~RDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4,
<br /> ' SECTION 4.50 OF THE CITY CODE OF
<br /> RAMSEY, MINNESOTA.
<br /> The City of Ramsay Ordains:
<br /> SECTION I. AMENDMENT
<br /> A. Section 4.50 entitled Ramsey's Financing
<br /> Policy and specifically Sections 4.50.01, Subd.
<br /> l.b "Residential Street" and Subd. 2
<br /> · "Sealcoatlng" are amended to read as follows:
<br /> r ~ b. Residential Street
<br />' 1. The total cost of initial street construction
<br />shall be specially assessed to benefiting proper-
<br />= ty owners on a unit method or front foot basis.'
<br />i' 2. 50% of the cost for reconstruction or
<br />~ overlays on existing bituminous streets shall be
<br />i specially assessed to the benefiting property
<br />~ owners. The remaining 50% of this cost shall be
<br />: paid from the City's General Fund. However,
<br />r when a previously proposed seelcoatlng project
<br />',has been defeated by petition, the benefited
<br />~ property owners shall be assessed 100% of the
<br />'. project cost. The reason for this 100% assess-
<br /> . merit Is because when a sealcoating project has
<br /> r been defeated by petition, this means that the
<br /> ~. affected street has not received proper
<br /> · maintenance and therefore the cost of
<br /> i. reconstruction and/or overlay will be substan-
<br /> r tlally more than if the street had received
<br /> i sealcoatlng in a timely fashion.
<br /> ~ 3. On M.S.A. streets which provide access to
<br /> i residential lots, 50% of the cost for the
<br /> ~ reconstruction/overlays for a typical residen-
<br /> f~tial street shall be specially assessed to the
<br /> ting property owners with the remaining
<br /> lng paid from the M.S.A. maintenance
<br />
<br /> 3. Sealcoatlng
<br /> . a. The total cost for the Initial sealcoating on
<br /> ~ City streels shall be specially assessed 1o the
<br /> · benefited property owners on a front foot or unit
<br /> ' basis.
<br /> b. 50% of the cost for second and subsequent
<br /> sealcoating applications on ~:lty streets shall be
<br /> I specially assessed Io the benefited property
<br /> 'owners and the remaining 50% shall be paid
<br /> r~ from the City's general fund.
<br />~ c. The payment for initial sealcoatlng on
<br />~M.S.A. streets shall be paid from M.S.A.
<br />I' maintenance funds. '
<br />', d. Payment for second and subsequent
<br /> sealcoating applications on M.S.A. street shall
<br />'- be paid from the City's general fund.
<br />', e. fn the event the benefited property owners
<br />i petltion to defeat a sealcoatlng project, the
<br />~benefffed property owners will be assessed
<br />! 100% of the cost v~hen the sealcoating Im-
<br />I provement is finally completed. The reason for
<br />~ this 1(X)% assessment is that the cost of
<br />I sealcoating Is substantially Increased when a
<br />
<br />~ street has missed its normally scheduled
<br />~ sealcoatlng maintenance, which sealc0atlng
<br />(generally is on an every six year sc. hedule.
<br />,' SECTION 2, EFFECTIVE DATE
<br />· This Ordinance becomes effective thirty (30)
<br />~days after Its publication, subject to City
<br />i Charter Section 5.07.
<br />, PASSED by the City Council of the City of
<br />~' Ramsay, Minnesota, this 9th day of April, 1991.
<br />~,-s-Jarnes GIIbertson
<br />~ Mayor
<br />~.ATTEST:
<br />, -s-Sandra Ashley Hefting
<br />~ Acting City Administrator
<br />'i abcdefghljklmnopqrstuvwxyz
<br /> Published in Anoka Co. Union
<br /> April 19, 1991
<br />
<br />STATE OF MINNESOTA )
<br /> SS
<br />County oJ Anoka )
<br />
<br /> Peter G. Bodley, being duly sworn, on oath says that he is the managing editor of the
<br />newspaper known as the Anoka County Union, and has full knowledge of the facts which are
<br />stated below:
<br />
<br /> (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification
<br />as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other
<br />applicable laws, as amended.
<br />
<br /> (B) The printed ...0RODIANCE ...................................................
<br />
<br />which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and
<br />published once each week, for...O~le.., successive weeks; it was first published on Friday,
<br />the .... .J.~h ....... day of .../~)V.j.] ......... 19.9~., and was thereafter printed and
<br />published on every Friday to and including Friday, the ................ day of
<br />
<br />................ ,19 .... ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z,
<br />both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the
<br />composition and publication of the notice:
<br />
<br />abcdefghij klmnopqrstuvwxyz
<br />abcde~ ..........................
<br /> Managing Editor
<br />
<br />Subscribed and sworn to before me on
<br />
<br />(~~~..1..CYch day of ..... .~p/'. ] ] ....... 19.9].
<br />
<br /> ~ ~ '~- ........ Y m sion expires May ~0 1995
<br /> '~ ,. ~ , . ,
<br />
<br /> RATE INFORMATION
<br />
<br />( 1 ) Lowest classified rate paid by
<br /> commercial users for comparable
<br /> space
<br />
<br />(2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the
<br /> above matter
<br />
<br />(3) Rate actually charged for the above
<br /> matter
<br />
<br /> 7.00
<br />(Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />
<br /> 7.00
<br />(Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />
<br /> 4.30
<br />(Line, word, or inch rate)
<br />
<br />
<br />
|