Laserfiche WebLink
land. He stated this matter requires appropriate language revisions, the advice of the City Attorney, and <br />the review of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Written comment provided by absent Commissioner Rolfe: "I strongly agree with staff's <br />recommendation, we must collect park fees from lot splits. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johns, seconded by Commissioner Droegemueller, to recommend the <br />Planning Commission amend the subdivision ordinance to provide for park dedication for multi-unit <br />projects. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Cook, Commissioners Johns, Droegemueller, Asfahl, and Ostrum. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners LaMere and Rolfe. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cook stated that a dwelling unit is a dwelling unit without regard to whether it is urban or <br />rural, or an attached dwelling. <br /> <br />Case/44: Review Emerald Pond Park Development Plan <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that the purpose of the case is to address the completion of the <br />pergola and associated landscaping at Emerald Pond Park. He stated the park has received <br />approximately 250,000 of improvements, to date. He stated the last project, which commenced over a <br />year ago, was the pergola located on the north side of the park. He stated staff proposes to improve the <br />area, which at present is somewhat stark. He provided the Commission with a plan of the proposed <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated he was proposing a stainless steel and rock fountain to be located <br />in the center of the pergola, which would be very attractive as well as vandal resistant. He stated the <br />fountain would provide a seating area for park visitors, and would assist in mitigating any urban noise. <br />He stated a rheostat could be utilized to control the water volume of the fountain, and the water would <br />run out from the artificial creek bed, go underneath the path, and exit into the existing pond. He stated <br />this process would not re-circulate the water, which in time it would cause evaporation, and pose some <br />maintenance problems, but would use the actual pond water which would provide an aeration function, <br />and would never run out of water. <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained that trees would be symmetrically placed to pattem with the <br />symetry of the pergola and perennials and shrubs would be planted between the trees. <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated there is approximately $27,000 remaining in the Emerald Pond <br />Park budget that was identified indirectly for this project, and based upon an estimate he had obtained, <br />the cost of the proposal would be approximately $26,000. <br /> <br />Park/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated staff requests, based upon the Commission's discussion, that the <br />Commission recommend that this proposal move forward as soon as possible. He stated the bidding <br />process might begin in 1999, however, the construction will not occur until the year 2000. He stated that <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/September 9, 1999 <br /> Page 12 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />