My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/12/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2023
>
Minutes - Council - 12/12/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:20:38 AM
Creation date
1/11/2024 9:29:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/12/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Howell, to introduce Ordinance <br />#23-19 amending Chapter 117 pertaining to temporary signs. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff aye <br />Councilmember Olson aye <br />Councilmember Specht aye <br />Councilmember Musgrove aye <br />Councilmember Howell aye <br />Councilmember Riley aye <br />Mayor Kuzma aye <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />7.02: Introduction of Ordinance #23-18, Amending Chapter 105, Buildings and Building <br />Regulations, pertaining to Address Numbers <br /> <br />Planning Manager Larson reviewed the Staff report in regard to amending Chapter 105 of the City <br />Code pertaining to buildings and building regulations for address numbers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked if there were any concerns or objections raised at the Planning <br />Commission meeting about any portions of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Larson shared that they did talk about some of the contrasting and visibility at <br />night; however, these provisions have been modified so the proposed ordinance was based off of <br />that discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell shared her main concern reading through this is how it applies to <br />residential buildings requiring it to be on the primary structure. She noted that a lot of people may <br />have a boulder out that is decorative where they have these numbers displayed. She added that <br />there is an allowance if someone’s primary structure is hidden by trees; however, she does not like <br />that it would be allowed for some people and not others. She stated that she would like to see the <br />requirement go away for having the numbers on the primary structure and to be required to have <br />the light reflective coating if it is not on the primary structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht agreed and shared they may need to spend more time looking at the <br />residential piece of this. He noted that he is okay with the new construction and commercial <br />updates. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Larson shared that this provision is in the Building Code today, so this mirrors <br />the Building Code. He shared that when a house is built, the number is put on the house. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked about the construction site requirements and how the signage is <br />supposed to meet the requirements in the section above, yet the home is not completely <br />constructed. She asked more about how this works for the construction sites. <br />City Council / December 12, 2023 <br />Page 10 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.