Laserfiche WebLink
Special Planning Commission 5. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 03/02/2023 <br />By: Todd Larson, Community Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Zoning Code Update: PUD, PI, and P Districts <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Tonight, we will discuss a few proposed zoning districts. <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />A PUD is intended to provide flexibility and an alternative to standard zoning districts in order to achieve a more <br />superior project. Ramsey currently has two PUD districts. The first is the Mixed -Use PUD (MU-PUD) that is <br />only used in the vicinity of Riverdale Drive and Jasper Street. This existing district does not provide for any <br />mixed uses in a vertically -integrated way, so staff is proposing to eliminate this district as those properties can <br />easily be rezoned to the proposed R2 (for the townhomes) and either the proposed B2 or B3 (for the commercial <br />uses). This was presented at the meeting on 2/23. <br />The other existing district is PUD (see Sec. 117-123. - Planned Unit Development District. 1 Code of Ordinances <br />Ramsey, MN I Municode Library). This section has an intent portion that is proposed to remain along with a <br />lengthy list of standards and application procedures. The application standards are being moved to a general <br />application section that the Planning Commission will review at a future meeting. The development standards are <br />being removed in order to promote the flexibility that the district intends to create. Instead, staff is proposing a <br />section that requires all of the proposed development's standards be listed in its approval ordinance. Since the <br />creation of a PUD is considered a rezoning, that action has a high level of discretion by the Planning Commission <br />and Council. If they each feel like a proposed development is not meeting the intent of a PUD, then they are not <br />required to approve it. <br />In reviewing the existing PUDs, there are several residential districts that were created to balance rural lot areas <br />and open space. These districts are likely to remain in place. Others appear to have been created simply to allow <br />for common -wall property division in industrial areas. Those PUDs are likely to be eliminated as the Business <br />Districts section has a provision for zero lot line developments and buildings. <br />Public/Institutional District (PI) <br />The Comprehensive Plan identifies several properties as "public/institutional." These properties are generally <br />City -owned facilities such as water towers and cemeteries; schools; and larger religious institutions. It also <br />includes the Rum River Scout Camp. These types of uses are generally specialized in nature and open to the <br />public or provide non-commercial service to the public. These uses often have multiple structures on a site. As <br />such, they are often scattered throughout the community and do not fall into a typical business or residential <br />zoning district well. The existing Public/Quasi-Public zoning regulations simply list some of these uses, but are <br />missing the uses of some of the properties identified in the Comprehensive Plan (ie, religious institutions). The <br />proposed section includes those uses. <br />The existing regulations do not provide any development, landscaping, or architectural standards either. Most <br />communities do not list such standards or keep them minimal due to the specialized users in this district. Staff' is <br />proposing some clauses that does not set forth any specific standards either, but rather require structures and sites <br />to be respectful of surrounding uses in their designs. <br />Parks and Open Space (P) <br />