My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/12/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2023
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 10/12/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 12:42:50 PM
Creation date
1/16/2024 8:55:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
10/12/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.01: Consider Amendment to Temporary Signage Regulations During Highway 10 <br />Ramsey Gateway Project <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan presented the staff report. <br />Member Johnson asked if there would be temporary signage that identifies the route to reach <br />businesses that are directly impacted by the construction and detours. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan replied that would not be part of the proposed <br />amendment to sign regulations and would be addressed by communications during the project, <br />such as business district signage which is done by MnDOT. He stated that perhaps the City could <br />look into supplemental signage above what would be done b nDOT. He explained that this <br />discussion today would allow for businesses themselves have temporary signage during <br />construction. <br />Chairperson Wiyninger asked what businesses wo <br />example of advertising or direction. <br />to use these or using the <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan replied that th=.•onses have been varied but multi - <br />tenant businesses are limited in signage; and this would allow . ditional opportunity. He noted <br />that if people decide to take Bunker Lake Boulevard rather than thig�way, it would be nice to <br />have signage on that roadway to direct traffic and gain new customers. He noted that directional <br />signage would not be as helpful as offsite signage is not allowed. <br />Member Riley acknowle <br />therefore believes that <br />he does not have a <br />the cost. <br />his will be hard on the businesses but for the greater good and <br />a good thing ey could do for the businesses. He stated that <br />e map. He ed if there has been consideration of waiving <br />Economic Ddropment Mana_ - ' ullivan repd that was discussed internally but when they did <br />that for ertising in the newsletter, it did become an accounting issue and there was still a cost <br />whic aid by the EDA. He stated that the problem would also be if this is not offered city- <br />wide, th could be seen as helping one business at the cost of another business. <br />Member Howell stated that she is also generally supportive of this and asked if an addendum could <br />be added that the businesses be revisited one month into the program to see how it is going and <br />It 0, <br />see if there are any ksnecessary such as allowing off -site signage, larger signs, or more <br />signage. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan asked if that would be done with a survey. He stated <br />that could be done and there would be minimal cost if that were done through email. <br />Member Howell confirmed that is what she was thinking. <br />Economic Development Authority/ September 14, 2023 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.