My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 12/14/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2023
>
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 12/14/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:09:53 PM
Creation date
1/16/2024 8:56:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
12/14/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Wiyninger, Members Johnson, Stewart, Howell, <br />Lindahl, MacLennan, and Riley. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Economic Development Manager asked the applicant what the time frame was for opening the <br />restaurant. <br />Mr. Swanson stated that the lease commencement is January 1st with an estimated 12 weeks of <br />construction and anticipated opening on May 1st <br />4.02: Consider EDA Funding for Replacement of Entrance Monument at TH #47 and <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard NW <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan presented the staff report. <br />Member Johnson asked what the sign used to look like as she could not recall. <br />Member Riley commented that it was a smaller sign that was lit but did not match any of the other <br />City signs. He noted that it did not stand out. <br />Member Johnson stated that there has not been a sign in that location for a few years and she had <br />not noticed the previous sign. She asked if that would be the proper focal point and perhaps those <br />funds would be better allocated in another location. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan stated that he likes signage that is done right and looks <br />good. He agreed that the previous sign did not stand out. He commented that the Public Works <br />Committee and Parks put a lot of thought into this to ensure that it will look nice and stand out. <br />He noted that other communities have this type of signage at key entry points into the community. <br />He stated that location does have a lot of eyes on it and trusted that the design is something that <br />will be seen and will be a landmark. He stated that he does support the sign and noted that there <br />is a significant EDA fund balance that has not been touched for a number of years and would <br />consider this to be a capital expense as there should not be much for ongoing maintenance costs. <br />He believed that there would still be funds to do other things in the COR and this expenditure <br />would not limit the ability to do other projects in the future. <br />Member Johnson stated that she does like the sign and was just questioning the location. <br />Member Lindahl commented that perception is exactly why the sign should be there to alert people <br />to the break between Anoka and Ramsey. She stated that the COR is easily identified as Ramsey <br />while that area may be confusing as to where Anoka and Ramsey split. <br />Chairperson Wiyninger agreed that it will be helpful to extend the branding to that edge and put <br />the Ramsey stamp there. <br />Member Riley stated that the City does have an existing location for the sign as well, which is <br />helpful. He stated that they are limited as to what can be done in that location and this does follow <br />Economic Development Authority/ December 14, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.