My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/17/2023
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2023
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 04/17/2023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:13:25 AM
Creation date
1/23/2024 11:48:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
04/17/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
feet in height or taller. <br /> •Rogers: deciduous trees with a DBH of six(6) inches or greater and evergreens that are six(6) feet in <br /> height or taller. <br /> •Dayton: deciduous hardwood tree (defined as ironwood, catalpa, oak,maple (hard),walnut, ash, hickory, <br /> birch,black cherry,hackberry, locus, and basswood)with a DBH of six(6) inches or greater, a common <br /> tree (presumably any other type of deciduous tree)with a DBH of twelve(12) inches or greater, and <br /> evergreens that are twelve(12) feet in height or greater(specifies that every 3 feet of height is the equivalent <br /> to 1 inch of DBH). <br /> •Plymouth: deciduous trees with a DBH of eight(8) inches or greater and evergreens with a DBH of four <br /> (4) inches or greater. <br /> Ramsey's definition seems to be somewhere in the middle. Staff is looking for consensus about whether the EPB <br /> is comfortable with the current definition of significant tree and whether there's any desire to place greater <br /> emphasis on certain genera or species' (this is something that we do already based on our definition of significant <br /> tree). By default,this would mean there is less emphasis on other species (the'soft'hardwoods, such as <br /> cottonwood,box elder,willows, silver maple, etc.). <br /> Staff would also encourage feedback on any other topic or content within either of the two attached drafts. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> This case is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties. <br /> Action: <br /> The Board's action will be based on discussion. But, Staff is seeking feedback and direction on the proposed <br /> revisions. Planning Division Staff are planning for a June Public Hearing for the rewrite of Chapter 117 and the <br /> intention would be to have the tree preservation and landscaping revisions completed so they can be included in <br /> that case. <br /> Attachments <br /> Andover Tree Preservation Policy <br /> Champlin Tree Preservation <br /> Dayton Tree Preservation <br /> Elk River Tree Preservation <br /> Lino Lakes Tree Preservation <br /> Rogers Tree Preservation <br /> Draft Landscaping Section <br /> Draft Tree Preservation Section <br /> Form Review <br /> Inbox Reviewed By Date <br /> Brian Hagen Brian Hagen 04/13/2023 11:22 AM <br /> Form Started By:Chris Anderson Started On:04/11/2023 08:17 AM <br /> Final Approval Date:04/13/2023 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.