Laserfiche WebLink
the City sign guidelines to create cohesive branding throughout the community. He believed that <br /> this would be an appropriate use of fund balance as well. He commented that while the cost of <br /> signage is always a shock, this will be built right to last with little ongoing maintenance costs. <br /> Member Johnson asked if only one bid was received. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that this falls under the threshold for <br /> bidding,but the City did make its best attempt to receive multiple quotes and therefore proceeding <br /> with the one quote would be acceptable. <br /> Chairperson Wiyninger referenced the options for funding before the EDA. He asked where the <br /> remaining funding would come from if the EDA were to only recommend funding half of the <br /> balance. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that would need to be determined. He <br /> stated that initially the sign was fully funded through the EDA and therefore that could be done <br /> again. <br /> Member Stewart commented that she could support 50 percent but would not want to fund more <br /> than that from the EDA. She stated that she would also like to see more quotes. <br /> Chairperson Wiyninger stated that he looks at the businesses that are there that have aligned their <br /> businesses with Ramsey and this would be a way to show that the EDA recognizes that and <br /> supports those businesses as well. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that both landowners for the multi-tenant <br /> spaces have recently reinvested into their properties to enhance that vision and therefore the sign <br /> would show commitment to the area as well. <br /> Motion by Member Johnson, seconded by Member Howell, to allocate up to $21,500 from the <br /> EDA Unencumbered Fund Balance for the construction of a monument sign at the NW corner of <br /> Highway 47 and Bunker Lake Boulevard NW. (Note that the $4,500 in insurance money already <br /> received would be allocated in addition to the $21,500) <br /> Further discussion: Member Stewart commented that she does not agree that this would be the <br /> best way to spend these funds in order to support these businesses. She asked why the money <br /> would only come from one fund, rather than be split between the different funding sources. <br /> Economic Development Manager commented that this is not a budgeted expense and therefore the <br /> $21,500 would come from the unencumbered fund balance and believed that within the budget the <br /> funds would most likely be coded as marketing but ultimately would be decided by the Finance <br /> Director. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Wiyninger, Members Johnson, Howell, Lindahl, <br /> MacLennan, and Riley. Voting No: Member Stewart. Absent: None. <br /> 5. MEMBER/ STAFF UPDATE <br /> Economic Development Authority/December 14, 2023 <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />