Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Manager Larson provided additional details on how that standard would typically be <br />measured and how it was measured in this instance. <br />Commissioner Van Scoy commented that he would believe that the garage is part of the principle <br />building in this instance. <br />Citizen Input <br />Nick Larson, applicant, stated that there is a large tree on the side of the home which has a large <br />root system they did not want to disrupt. He stated that the location of the shed also did not <br />interfere with the location of the sprinklers. He stated that they also considered locating near the <br />deck, but the runoff would have gone onto the neighbor's property. He confirmed that they would <br />need to uproot the entire sprinkler system to have the shed in the side yard location. He believed <br />that the location for the shed fits well with the existing vegetation and additional vegetation that <br />they planted for screening. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Bauer, Van Scoy, Heineman, <br />Hunt, and Peters. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Anderson. <br />Chairperson Gengler closed the public hearing at 7:13 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated that when reviewing a variance, they should consider whether <br />there is another place that would fit the requirements. He stated that there is another location that <br />would meet the standards, but the issue was the cost to relocate the sprinklers and cost cannot be <br />considered. He stated that he would think that because of the screening, he does believe that this <br />location is probably the better choice but would still have a hard time supporting the request. <br />Commissioner Heineman commented that this is a suitable location, and the variance process <br />exists for this reason. He found this to be a reasonable ask and will therefore support the request. <br />Planning Manager Larson stated that while financial considerations cannot be the sole factor, they <br />can weigh in on the overall determination. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bauer, seconded by Commissioner Heineman, to adopt Resolution #23- <br />294 Approving a Variance to Accessory Structure Setbacks at 6070 143rd Lane NW. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Bauer, Heineman, Hunt, and <br />Peters. Voting No: Commissioner Van Scoy. Absent: Commissioner Anderson. <br />6.02: Public Hearing: Consider a Conditional Ise Permit from Rare Pomeranians at 15110 <br />Uranimite St NW <br />Planning Commission/ November 30, 2023 <br />Page 3 of 12 <br />