Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Van Scoy stated that perhaps additional clarity should be added. <br />Motion by Commissioner Heineman, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to recommend that <br />City Council adopt Ordinance #23-18, Amending Chapter 105, Buildings and Building <br />Regulations, Pertaining to Address Numbers with the clarification of daylight hours as discussed. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Heineman, Van Scoy, Bauer, <br />Hunt, and Peters. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Anderson. <br />6.04: Public Hearing: Consider Ordinance #23-19 Amending Temporary Sign Regulations <br />Public Hearinw <br />Chairperson Gengler called the public hearing to order at 7:40 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Planning Manager Larson presented the staff report stating that staff and the EDA recommend <br />adoption of Ordinance #23-19 pertaining to temporary signs. <br />Commissioner Bauer asked if a business could have a temporary sign for 20 weeks in the first year <br />and 20 weeks in the second year. He stated that some businesses were lost during the Armstrong <br />interchange construction because of the reduced visibility and difficulty reaching those businesses. <br />He asked why the temporary signage would be limited to 20 weeks. <br />Planning Manager Larson replied that this is a temporary sign. He stated that if a business wanted <br />to invest in permanent signage changes, they could do so, noting that taller signs are now allowed <br />in the corridor. He stated that the EDA was looking to provide a low-cost option for a business, <br />without allowing something that would be tacky or a distraction. <br />Commissioner Bauer commented that he did not believe a business would want to install a <br />permanent sign that would only be needed for one to two years. He stated that the ordinance does <br />allow for signs to be located on other property if the permission of the property owner is obtained. <br />He noted that people will most likely use that option to assist in directing traffic to their business. <br />He stated that he would favor this without the 20-week annual limit. <br />Planning Manager Larson stated that issue was discussed. He noted that in the winter months the <br />construction would ease up and therefore the 20-week period would cover most of the construction <br />season. <br />Commissioner Bauer commented that 20 weeks would cover a portion of that time, but not the <br />entire construction season. <br />Planning Commission/ November 30, 2023 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />