My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/20/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2024
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/20/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:46:08 AM
Creation date
2/16/2024 2:40:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/20/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phone Number <br />Yes, I support a full public road connection <br />Yes, but only if it is used by Public Safety (and Public Works Maintenance) <br />No, I do not support a second connection to Bowers Drive <br />Other (please describe below) <br />1f7mPin i <br />For purposes of this survey, a non -response will be considered as a non -objection to the connection. <br />Please comment and explain your response above. <br />I don't see the benefit or the actual need case, nor any data or history justifying the change. If the potential issue is a tree <br />falling across the road, the city could instead proactively trim trees. As the structure of Bowers Drive is not on the table, it <br />would seem to be of minimal benefit to have a 24 foot wide road with curb and gutter as the public works department is <br />proposing rather than a wide trail, as the rest of the road does not have this structure either. If a road were required, a formal <br />barrier would be important to restrict access and would be minimal hindrance to public safety. Perhaps a better investment <br />would be fire hydrants. My primary concern is that the road would draw additional vehicle traffic from new development residents <br />looking for an alternate route to highway 10. Bowers drive already has a large number of residents who exercise, walk, & and <br />take pets along Bowers Drive. Additional auto traffic would pose a significant danger to residents, outweighing any potential <br />safety benefits from a second access. Additionally, extra walkers from the new development looking to complete a loop <br />between the new development and Bowers Drive would add to the number of pedestrians, bikes or dogs along the road, further <br />exacerbating the new hazard created by the proposed new access road. Finally, I am concerned this is just step one of a larger <br />plan by city developers to change Bowers drive road, widening the access, adding curb & gutter, etc. which would change the <br />character of the neighborhood and negatively impact the current lot structure. If public safety is truly the concern of the city - <br />improving or revising entrance and exit access to Bowers Drive should be the first focus- the current access to/from the <br />neighborhood from Highway 10 is extremely dangerous- not enough distance to accelerate or decelerate, as well hazard of <br />crossing the highway. This hazard would get worse with additional traffic from the new development using the access road as a <br />short cut up Bowers Drive onto Highway 10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.