My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/12/1999
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
1999
>
Minutes - Council - 10/12/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 4:13:37 PM
Creation date
5/30/2003 8:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/12/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Jankowski replied that there were still technical issues that needed to be resolved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that if Staff did not feel they had all the answers during the <br />previous Council meeting then they should have asked more questions and if more questions <br />came up between the meetings then they should have contacted Councilmembers to correct the <br />issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if Minnesota State Statute 444 is workable. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the Statute is very workable, and to move forward the <br />Council would need to establish a district, direct Staff to schedule a public hearing, and adopt an <br />ordinance and feasibility study. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen replied that the boundaries were proposed during the previous <br />Council meeting including the area from Highway #10 to the railroad tracks and from Sunfish <br />Lake Boulevard to the City of Ramsey border. <br /> <br />Councihnember Anderson inquired if the railroad had been contacted. <br /> <br />Lowell Zitzloff, stated that he was under the impression that the City would be contacting the <br />railroad company. If he is required to take care of the drainage problem himself then he would <br />be happy to contact the railroad. He requested that he be allowed to move ahead with taking care <br />of his own drainage problem and then if the City wants to place an oversized pipe under the <br />railroad tracks in the future then he would be willing to connect to it. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen replied that one of the things that he has learned by being a <br />Councilmember is that if they allow something to a happen without solving the larger problem, it <br />always has a way of coming back to the City. He explained that there are adjoining parcels that <br />drain onto his property and his perception is that he would correct his problems and then the City <br />would have a drainage problem on adjacent properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Zitzloff responded that discussions regarding the issue began months ago. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski noted that the application was received on August 19, 1999. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich suggested to move the issue forward to have Mr. Zitzloff contact the <br />railroad and determine the permits needed to get under the railroad tracks and drain into the <br />pond. Staff will prepare an ordinance to establish a sub watershed district and schedule a public <br />hearing and have the City Engineer do the feasibility study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what is sufficient time for a feasibility study. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that he would have to have dialogue with adjacent property <br />owners within the area to determine how much drainage they would like provided. He explained <br /> <br />City Council/October 12, 1999 <br /> Page 10 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.