Laserfiche WebLink
<br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> <br />1. That the Variance will be in accordance with the objectives of the intent of Section <br />106-220 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code, specifically: That adjacent and nearby <br />properties have been granted Variances to the maximum impervious surfacing <br />requirement in the Rum River Wild and Scenic Overlay District in the City’s history, <br />of similar or greater extents to the Applicant’s proposal. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE <br />CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />1) That the Ramsey Planning Commission hereby grants approval of a variance (the <br />“Variance”) to deviate from the required maximum impervious surfacing regulation set <br />forth in Section 106-950 to allow up to 52 percent of impervious surfacing on the entire <br />Subject Property, and to allow up to 58 percent of impervious surfacing the portion of <br />the Subject Property that falls within the Rum River Wild and Scenic Overlay District, <br />subject to review and approval as to legal form and contingent upon the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />CONDITIONS <br /> <br />1. That this variance is based off of a conceptual site plan dated 1/9/2024 with the intent <br />of applying for a building permit with an administrative site plan review. <br /> <br />2. That the Applicant shall comply with all Staff comments as noted in ProjectDox for <br />that conceptual site plan. <br /> <br />3. That the Permittee shall not expand the impervious surfacing on the Subject Property <br />in any way unless in full compliance with City Code. <br /> <br />4. That the Permittee shall be responsible for all City costs incurred in administering and <br />enforcing this Variance. <br /> <br />5. That this resolution shall be recorded against the property with the Anoka County <br />Recorder’s Office prior to receiving a building permit. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Van <br />Scoy and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br /> Chairperson Gengler <br /> Commissioner Hunt <br /> Commissioner Van Scoy <br /> Commissioner Anderson <br /> Commissioner Bauer <br /> Commissioner Heineman <br /> Commissioner Peters <br />RESOLUTION #24-040 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />