My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/19/2024
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2024
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 03/19/2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:46:23 AM
Creation date
3/18/2024 8:52:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
03/19/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
364
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
were taken to determine the wetland boundary. Soils,hydrology and topography aided in <br /> determining the wetland boundary. <br /> At the wetland pit location W 8A the plant community is dominated by a sedge species and Canada. <br /> bluejoint. The upland pit location W813 is dominated by Canada goldenrod, Siberian elm, and <br /> quaking aspen. Only the wetland plant community is considered hydrophytic. <br /> Soils in the wetland pit location W 8A were marked as Other and assumed to meet a hydric soil <br /> indicator below the thick dark surface. Soils in the upland pit location W813 did not meet any hydric <br /> soil indicators. <br /> Soils in the wetland pit W8A were not saturated. The wetland pit location met secondary hydrology <br /> indicators D2 and D5. Soils in the upland pit location W813 were not saturated and did not meet any <br /> hydrology indicators. <br /> The determining factor for this delineation was the lack of all three indicators at the upland pit <br /> location. The boundaries were determined by following the topographic break and vegetative break. <br /> V1. CONCLUSION <br /> This delineation was performed in September of 2022. The boundaries of the wetlands were staked <br /> in the field with three foot"Wetland Delineation"pin flags. The location of the pin flags were <br /> surveyed by Bolton&Menk,Inc.using a sub-foot GPS Data Collector and tied to the Anoka <br /> County coordinate system. The delineated limits are believed to be the upper limits of where all <br /> three of the required wetland criteria were present. <br /> Bolton&Menk,Inc.,was asked to determine the boundaries of those jurisdictional wetlands that <br /> exist upon this property as defined by the Wetland Conservation Act. <br /> Based upon all available information,the existing conditions that currently prevail, and the on-site <br /> investigation, evidence supports the presence of eight wetlands within the boundaries of the study <br /> corridor. <br /> WETLAND SUMMARY <br /> IdW Wetland Type", Size's <br /> W1 Type 2 2.65 ac <br /> W2 Type 4/7 1.65 ac <br /> W3 Type 4/6 0.53 ac <br /> W4 Type 3/7 0.53 ac <br /> W5 Type 6 0.91 ac <br /> W6 Type 4/6 2.78 ac <br /> W7 Type 2/3/4/7 1.60 ac <br /> W8 Type 1 0.04 ac <br /> *size measured within study area. <br /> ^wetland type within study area <br /> Sincerely, <br /> BOLTON&MENK, INC. <br /> Kristina Bloomquist,PWS <br /> Certified Wetland Delineator,No. 1340 <br /> Prepared by:Bolton&Menk,Inc. CONCLUSION <br /> Ramsey COR Wetland Analysis I OR1.128637 Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.